96583UP wrote:
Bammer wrote:
96583UP wrote:
you're just not going to find reasonable quality for less than $200
I was really hoping that your presence in this thread would result in a deepfake n00d
- Spoiler: show
- Spoiler: show
| Red Mosquito http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
| AOC http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=13195 |
Page 26 of 42 |
| Author: | Jorge [ Sun October 13, 2019 4:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
96583UP wrote: Bammer wrote: 96583UP wrote: you're just not going to find reasonable quality for less than $200 I was really hoping that your presence in this thread would result in a deepfake n00d
|
|
| Author: | 96583UP [ Sun October 13, 2019 4:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
theplatypus wrote: 96583UP wrote: Bammer wrote: 96583UP wrote: you're just not going to find reasonable quality for less than $200 I was really hoping that your presence in this thread would result in a deepfake n00d
somewhere a DNC supercomputer that was crunching big data for weeks and just generated the same image to depict the projected ideal democratic candidate |
|
| Author: | BurtReynolds [ Fri October 25, 2019 2:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
Impeach this bitch NOW https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-ente ... 6MmxadRplw |
|
| Author: | epilogue [ Fri October 25, 2019 3:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
BurtReynolds wrote: I truly believe that behind those sexy aviators your eyes spin in opposite directions. |
|
| Author: | Bammer [ Fri October 25, 2019 5:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
BurtReynolds wrote: This can’t be real |
|
| Author: | McParadigm [ Fri October 25, 2019 11:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
Bammer wrote: BurtReynolds wrote: This can’t be real https://youtu.be/Dl-6N_bXdQ8 She seems super serious about it, and you should totally read it that way |
|
| Author: | BurtReynolds [ Fri October 25, 2019 5:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
You don't joke about that. |
|
| Author: | Bi_3 [ Fri October 25, 2019 5:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
BurtReynolds wrote: You don't joke about that. 
|
|
| Author: | BurtReynolds [ Fri October 25, 2019 8:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
Bi_3 wrote: BurtReynolds wrote: You don't joke about that. :❤: |
|
| Author: | Bammer [ Sat October 26, 2019 3:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
McParadigm wrote: Bammer wrote: BurtReynolds wrote: This can’t be real https://youtu.be/Dl-6N_bXdQ8 She seems super serious about it, and you should totally read it that way Burt. I just watched this. Relax. |
|
| Author: | McParadigm [ Sat December 07, 2019 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
| Author: | Bi_3 [ Sat December 07, 2019 6:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
McParadigm wrote: That is certainly one way to interpret those events. |
|
| Author: | verb_to_trust [ Sat December 07, 2019 6:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
Bi_3 wrote: McParadigm wrote: That is certainly one way to interpret those events. Yeah man, Amazon is the best |
|
| Author: | Bammer [ Sat December 07, 2019 7:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
McParadigm wrote: Caption this photo |
|
| Author: | McParadigm [ Sat December 07, 2019 7:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
Bammer wrote: McParadigm wrote: Caption this photo When the judge actually listens to you and raises bail on your violent ex to $2.5m instead of $250k, so he doesn’t get out and kill you in a school parking lot. |
|
| Author: | 4/5 [ Sat December 07, 2019 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
verb_to_trust wrote: Bi_3 wrote: McParadigm wrote: That is certainly one way to interpret those events. Yeah man, Amazon is the best Amazon: Pretty good retailer, a driving force for efficiency and convenience gains enjoyed by consumers from a wide range of companies recently. Corporate welfare subsidies: Bad. AOC: Right that corporate welfare subsidies are bad and right to oppose $1.5 billion (or $3B depending on which article I'm reading) in handouts for Amazon. Also AOC: Probably exaggerating that this is 'vindication' since it isn't as if they are headquartering there or creating anywhere near as many jobs as they would have previously. Me: I kinda hope that AOC's messaging here wins even if I don't think it's completely justified because I'd like cities and states to stop giving away taxpayer dollars to lure huge corporations to their locale. |
|
| Author: | B [ Sat December 07, 2019 9:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
|
|
| Author: | Bi_3 [ Sat December 07, 2019 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
She’s also not getting the all infrastructure and construction/support jobs. And the school. And the mass transit improvements. And the tax revenue from the other 23,500 jobs. Instead Amazon will put people into a shiny new space in midtown where they won’t need to ever go near or spend a dollar LIC. |
|
| Author: | bune [ Sat December 07, 2019 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
McParadigm wrote: Bammer wrote: McParadigm wrote: Caption this photo When the judge actually listens to you and raises bail on your violent ex to $2.5m instead of $250k, so he doesn’t get out and kill you in a school parking lot. that guy died, McParadigm. also turns out I know the judge in question... 4/5 wrote: verb_to_trust wrote: Bi_3 wrote: McParadigm wrote: That is certainly one way to interpret those events. Yeah man, Amazon is the best Amazon: Pretty good retailer, a driving force for efficiency and convenience gains enjoyed by consumers from a wide range of companies recently. Corporate welfare subsidies: Bad. AOC: Right that corporate welfare subsidies are bad and right to oppose $1.5 billion (or $3B depending on which article I'm reading) in handouts for Amazon. Also AOC: Probably exaggerating that this is 'vindication' since it isn't as if they are headquartering there or creating anywhere near as many jobs as they would have previously. Me: I kinda hope that AOC's messaging here wins even if I don't think it's completely justified because I'd like cities and states to stop giving away taxpayer dollars to lure huge corporations to their locale. fully onboard for that one. |
|
| Author: | 96583UP [ Mon December 09, 2019 2:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: AOC |
i don't think municipalities should 'give' money to big corporations or to sports franchises to build stadiums. but if a big corporation is choosing between locations and one municipality is willing to offer them a 'discount' on their tax rate so as to lure them to their town, i have no problem with that if there remain a significant net positive for the municipality (e.g. tens of thousands of jobs). https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/op-ed-governor-andrew-m-cuomo Quote: The New York Post, which is representative of extreme conservatives, says essentially that New York "gave Amazon $1 billion." Their argument is factually baseless. New York State and New York City gave Amazon nothing. Amazon, by our current tax structure, would generate approximately $1 billion per year in new revenue. Our proposal offered that, when and if those revenues are realized, the government would effectively reduce their $1 billion payment by about $100 million for a net to New York of approximately $900 million. New York doesn't give Amazon $100 million. Amazon gives New York $900 million. The revenue is from state and city taxes, including income taxes [in New York State and New York City: one of the highest rates in the country] with the second highest millionaire's tax in the country (only California is higher).
|
|
| Page 26 of 42 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
