Fri November 03, 2017 11:03 pm
Peeps wrote:i have given the option to moving in the future but only when my step father is no longer around as that is really the only thing that ties me to the area
Wed February 21, 2018 6:48 am
Fri February 23, 2018 3:03 pm
I have to admit, though, that if this is all he's been charged with and unless other facts emerge, Greitens might have a First Amendment defense here. It still doesn't obviate how horrible this is, though.The defendant. in violation of Section 565.252. RSMo, committed the class D felony of invasion of privacy in the first degree, punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.011, RSMo, in that on or about March 21, 2015, in the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, the defendant knowingly photographed K.S in a state of full or partial nudity without the knowledge and consent of K.S. and in a place where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the defendant subsequently transmitted the image contained in the
photograph in a manner that allowed access to that image via a computer.
Fri February 23, 2018 5:09 pm
Green Habit wrote:Paging Monkey_Driven and other Missourians:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/22/politics ... index.htmlI have to admit, though, that if this is all he's been charged with and unless other facts emerge, Greitens might have a First Amendment defense here. It still doesn't obviate how horrible this is, though.The defendant. in violation of Section 565.252. RSMo, committed the class D felony of invasion of privacy in the first degree, punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.011, RSMo, in that on or about March 21, 2015, in the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, the defendant knowingly photographed K.S in a state of full or partial nudity without the knowledge and consent of K.S. and in a place where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the defendant subsequently transmitted the image contained in the
photograph in a manner that allowed access to that image via a computer.
Wed May 16, 2018 4:18 pm
Wed May 16, 2018 4:25 pm
Peeps wrote:the amount of articles and accusations leveled at our counties reps (treasure, DA, sherriff, councilmen, local police officers, police departments being investigated by the state police and FBI and so forth is staggering
Wed May 23, 2018 11:48 am
Fri May 25, 2018 9:19 am
Fri May 25, 2018 2:49 pm
Tue May 29, 2018 10:26 pm
Green Habit wrote:Paging Monkey_Driven and other Missourians:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/22/politics ... index.htmlI have to admit, though, that if this is all he's been charged with and unless other facts emerge, Greitens might have a First Amendment defense here. It still doesn't obviate how horrible this is, though.The defendant. in violation of Section 565.252. RSMo, committed the class D felony of invasion of privacy in the first degree, punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.011, RSMo, in that on or about March 21, 2015, in the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, the defendant knowingly photographed K.S in a state of full or partial nudity without the knowledge and consent of K.S. and in a place where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the defendant subsequently transmitted the image contained in the
photograph in a manner that allowed access to that image via a computer.
Tue May 29, 2018 11:17 pm
Since this post of mine is getting requoted, I better make something clear. I'm reading here that there was intent to blackmail with the activity in question above. If that's the case, then that easily qualifies the "unless other facts emerge" part I wrote.Monkey_Driven wrote:He gone.Green Habit wrote:Paging Monkey_Driven and other Missourians:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/22/politics ... index.htmlI have to admit, though, that if this is all he's been charged with and unless other facts emerge, Greitens might have a First Amendment defense here. It still doesn't obviate how horrible this is, though.The defendant. in violation of Section 565.252. RSMo, committed the class D felony of invasion of privacy in the first degree, punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.011, RSMo, in that on or about March 21, 2015, in the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, the defendant knowingly photographed K.S in a state of full or partial nudity without the knowledge and consent of K.S. and in a place where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and the defendant subsequently transmitted the image contained in the
photograph in a manner that allowed access to that image via a computer.
Wed July 25, 2018 3:14 am
Mon May 06, 2019 1:57 pm
Mon May 06, 2019 3:33 pm
Mon May 06, 2019 7:08 pm
McParadigm wrote:The long term answer just cannot be to invest more money in high traffic, but my god do we need to innovate our public transit. We haven’t reasonably evolved our approach to bussing in decades, even as we’ve packed more and more people into the areas they serve and put more and more cars on the road around them.
I like the bus, but we did two carless years in Seattle in 2014-15 and it was a fucking chore.
Tue May 07, 2019 1:45 am
Is this the same thing Drew Magary ranted about?Bi_3 wrote:This 495 expansion project is getting ridiculous. The county has spent years building high density housing right against the highway to prevent enlargement and now that people have had enough of the traffic, the progs on the county are turning on everyone in the state government. It's the biggest bunch of "more other people should take the bus" bullshit I've ever heard.
Attention MoCo activists: NO ONE IS GOING TO SPEND 4 HOURS A DAY ON A BUS WHEN THEY CAN DRIVE THERE IN 20 MINUTES
Tue May 07, 2019 2:27 am
Green Habit wrote:Is this the same thing Drew Magary ranted about?Bi_3 wrote:This 495 expansion project is getting ridiculous. The county has spent years building high density housing right against the highway to prevent enlargement and now that people have had enough of the traffic, the progs on the county are turning on everyone in the state government. It's the biggest bunch of "more other people should take the bus" bullshit I've ever heard.
Attention MoCo activists: NO ONE IS GOING TO SPEND 4 HOURS A DAY ON A BUS WHEN THEY CAN DRIVE THERE IN 20 MINUTES
Tue May 21, 2019 12:39 pm
Bi_3 wrote:Green Habit wrote:Is this the same thing Drew Magary ranted about?Bi_3 wrote:This 495 expansion project is getting ridiculous. The county has spent years building high density housing right against the highway to prevent enlargement and now that people have had enough of the traffic, the progs on the county are turning on everyone in the state government. It's the biggest bunch of "more other people should take the bus" bullshit I've ever heard.
Attention MoCo activists: NO ONE IS GOING TO SPEND 4 HOURS A DAY ON A BUS WHEN THEY CAN DRIVE THERE IN 20 MINUTES
Yup, part of the ongoing “other people should take the bus more” problem and completely misrepresented the how much this is needed as evidenced by the success of MD200: https://wtop.com/dc-transit/2017/11/aaa ... connector/
Tue May 21, 2019 2:21 pm
I hear those things are awfully loud.Bi_3 wrote:The alternative is too good to be true:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/a-montgomery-developer-has-a-plan-to-ease-traffic-on-i-270-build-a-monorail/2019/05/18/fc89372a-7724-11e9-b3f5-5673edf2d127_story.html
Tue May 21, 2019 10:27 pm
Green Habit wrote:I hear those things are awfully loud.Bi_3 wrote:The alternative is too good to be true:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/a-montgomery-developer-has-a-plan-to-ease-traffic-on-i-270-build-a-monorail/2019/05/18/fc89372a-7724-11e9-b3f5-5673edf2d127_story.html