Switch to full style
Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post a reply

Who wins?

Patriots
13
57%
Falcons
10
43%
 
Total votes : 23

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 5:22 pm

Image

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 9:37 pm

Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.

For a guy who's revered as a genius, he sure seemed to fucking miss the forest for the trees there.

Also, congrats, Pats fans.

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 9:39 pm

This was the first ever American football game I've watched

All the usual complaints apply (WHY SO MANY GODDAMN PAUSES) but it got pretty exciting there at the end

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 9:45 pm

I'm a big fan of defensive football. So, the first quarter was the only part of the game that was all that interesting to me.

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 9:46 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.


you're smarter than this joey

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 9:46 pm

Trent Motherfucking Dilfer is a super bowl champion.......

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 9:56 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.

For a guy who's revered as a genius, he sure seemed to fucking miss the forest for the trees there.


Why didn't he call a timeout when the Seahawks were inside the 5? No one will ever know for sure, he does these sorts of things all the time, but I imagine it had something to do with how the Pats were performing in short-yardage situations up until that point (i.e., not well).

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 10:08 pm

Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.


you're smarter than this joey

I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris! ;)

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 10:26 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.


you're smarter than this joey

I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris! ;)

you know he wouldn't have gone for 2 if down by a point after scoring the last TD, and instead would've kicked to force OT. so OT was inevitable whether or not he went for 2 on the first TD.

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 10:29 pm

Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.


you're smarter than this joey

I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris! ;)

you know he wouldn't have gone for 2 if down by a point after scoring the last TD, and instead would've kicked to force OT. so OT was inevitable whether or not he went for 2 on the first TD.

Do I know that? Is that a BB thing? Seems fucking stupid. Seems especially stupid when you're down 21 to 3 in the the third quarter.

But whatever. It worked out fine, as usual, as predicted, for the Pats. All of this conjecture is meaningless.

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Tue February 07, 2017 10:33 pm

durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.


you're smarter than this joey

I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris! ;)

you know he wouldn't have gone for 2 if down by a point after scoring the last TD, and instead would've kicked to force OT. so OT was inevitable whether or not he went for 2 on the first TD.

Do I know that? Is that a BB thing? Seems fucking stupid. Seems especially stupid when you're down 21 to 3 in the the third quarter.

But whatever. It worked out fine, as usual, as predicted, for the Pats. All of this conjecture is meaningless.

i'll still invite you to my bubble-hockey party

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Wed February 08, 2017 12:37 am

Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.


you're smarter than this joey

I'm clearly smarter than the best coach in NFL history? Thanks, Chris! ;)

you know he wouldn't have gone for 2 if down by a point after scoring the last TD, and instead would've kicked to force OT. so OT was inevitable whether or not he went for 2 on the first TD.

Do I know that? Is that a BB thing? Seems fucking stupid. Seems especially stupid when you're down 21 to 3 in the the third quarter.

But whatever. It worked out fine, as usual, as predicted, for the Pats. All of this conjecture is meaningless.

i'll still invite you to my bubble-hockey party

:hooray:

That's all I ever wanted.

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Wed February 08, 2017 3:31 am

Silver lining; trying to take an opposite of sour grapes approach here.
The Atlanta Falcons are my favorite team in all of sports, always have been. There has definitely more bad than good, more thin than thick. Even when they made the playoffs a disappointing let down of an ending was inevitable. My earliest athletic related memory is an infamous early 80s playoff loss against Dallas when Danny White led a late come from behind rally to win. But this Falcon team was different. For a little while on Sunday I truly felt my favorite team was about to be Super Bowl Champions, an experience I had never felt. Ever. While the feeling was fleeting it was real. While a gut punch followed I did get that experience and for that I am grateful. No parade or banner to raise but I did get a little taste of that excitement.
I know it may not sound like much but there are several fan bases that haven't had even that.

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Wed February 08, 2017 3:34 am

please don't kill yourself, biff

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Wed February 08, 2017 3:37 am

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:please don't kill yourself, biff


It's okay, I'm good now.

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Wed February 08, 2017 3:41 am

Biff Pocoroba wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:please don't kill yourself, biff


It's okay, I'm good now.

good

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Wed February 08, 2017 12:29 pm

Biff Pocoroba wrote:Silver lining; trying to take an opposite of sour grapes approach here.
The Atlanta Falcons are my favorite team in all of sports, always have been. There has definitely more bad than good, more thin than thick. Even when they made the playoffs a disappointing let down of an ending was inevitable. My earliest athletic related memory is an infamous early 80s playoff loss against Dallas when Danny White led a late come from behind rally to win. But this Falcon team was different. For a little while on Sunday I truly felt my favorite team was about to be Super Bowl Champions, an experience I had never felt. Ever. While the feeling was fleeting it was real. While a gut punch followed I did get that experience and for that I am grateful. No parade or banner to raise but I did get a little taste of that excitement.
I know it may not sound like much but there are several fan bases that haven't had even that.


I can relate to all of that Biff. I don't remember Danny White, Billy White Shoes. Mine start the worse period after that with Gerald Riggs

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Wed February 08, 2017 5:10 pm

Simple Torture wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Why the entire FUCK didn't BB go for 2 on that first TD? If he had and failed to convert, his team would have been in the exact same situation they found themselves in. But if they'd converted, there never would have been an OT.

For a guy who's revered as a genius, he sure seemed to fucking miss the forest for the trees there.


Why didn't he call a timeout when the Seahawks were inside the 5? No one will ever know for sure, he does these sorts of things all the time, but I imagine it had something to do with how the Pats were performing in short-yardage situations up until that point (i.e., not well).


He says he didnt call the timeout because he thought the Seahawks looked confused and felt it was better to let things play out than give them time to regroup.

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Sat February 11, 2017 2:34 am

Image

Re: Super Bowl LI: Belichick vs. Dimitroff/Pioli

Sat February 11, 2017 2:43 am

that vest is genteel yet hype
Post a reply