The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: DAY FOURTEEN RESULTS
Posted: Tue November 29, 2016 2:45 am
Poster of the Year
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
The more I think about it, the less I like it too. Choosing which season to go with is a huge decision at the start of the season. You should be stuck with it.
Post subject: Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: DAY FOURTEEN RESULTS
Posted: Tue November 29, 2016 2:46 am
Poster of the Year
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
So I advocate for my proposal but with years stuck with drafted players. Either that or you can only add undrafted players, not players dropped by other teams.
Post subject: Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: DAY FOURTEEN RESULTS
Posted: Tue November 29, 2016 2:50 am
Commissioner
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am Posts: 11792
cutuphalfdead wrote:
The more I think about it, the less I like it too. Choosing which season to go with is a huge decision at the start of the season. You should be stuck with it.
I agree it is a huge decision, but I don't consider it any bigger than who you draft in each round. The way I see it, if we're allowing one change in that, I don't see why changing a year for one player isn't comparable. It's still one alteration on a roster of 25.
Post subject: Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: DAY FOURTEEN RESULTS
Posted: Tue November 29, 2016 2:51 am
Poster of the Year
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
A small reliever swap, or dumping a guy for an unknown quantity off the waiver wire allows for possible small situational improvements, like working around a whatif managerial quirk. Letting people change years allows for selecting a proven whatif quantity to correct a mistake or risk you shouldn't have taken.
Post subject: Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: DAY FOURTEEN RESULTS
Posted: Tue November 29, 2016 2:54 am
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm Posts: 10277 Location: in the air tonight
I don't intend to make any changes, but I think one should be able to switch years if they want. That's less of a big deal than trades or adding entirely new players. I don't see the big deal
Post subject: Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: DAY FOURTEEN RESULTS
Posted: Tue November 29, 2016 2:57 am
Commissioner
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am Posts: 11792
The Argonaut wrote:
I don't intend to make any changes, but I think one should be able to switch years if they want. That's less of a big deal than trades or adding entirely new players. I don't see the big deal
Yeah, I can buy that a waiver move is a less significant change than a year swap, but a trade is a far more powerful move than a year change in my eyes.
Post subject: Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: DAY FOURTEEN RESULTS
Posted: Tue November 29, 2016 3:00 am
RM Elitist
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm Posts: 9875
Lament wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:
I don't intend to make any changes, but I think one should be able to switch years if they want. That's less of a big deal than trades or adding entirely new players. I don't see the big deal
Yeah, I can buy that a waiver move is a less significant change than a year swap, but a trade is a far more powerful move than a year change in my eyes.
Year change is one party making their own move. There is no consenting party. No strategy.
Post subject: Re: Steroid Era (1986-2005) Tournament: DAY FOURTEEN RESULTS
Posted: Tue November 29, 2016 3:01 am
RM Elitist
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm Posts: 9875
@SkitchP wrote:
Lament wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:
I don't intend to make any changes, but I think one should be able to switch years if they want. That's less of a big deal than trades or adding entirely new players. I don't see the big deal
Yeah, I can buy that a waiver move is a less significant change than a year swap, but a trade is a far more powerful move than a year change in my eyes.
Year change is one party making their own move. There is no consenting party. No strategy.
It's risk free. Without any chance of improving the opposition.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum