Sat February 03, 2018 12:00 am
Sat February 03, 2018 11:11 pm
Sat February 03, 2018 11:29 pm
Sun February 04, 2018 3:21 am
Sun February 04, 2018 4:21 am
Sun February 04, 2018 4:31 am
numbers wrote:And the entirety of their success has occurred in the parity era of the NFL, where the league is designed to discourage runs like this.
Sun February 04, 2018 4:33 am
Sun February 04, 2018 4:35 am
spike wrote:numbers wrote:And the entirety of their success has occurred in the parity era of the NFL, where the league is designed to discourage runs like this.
Except it hasn't worked in the AFC. Hasn't it been the Pats, Steelers, or Broncos representing the AFC in an inordinately weird amount of SBs over the last 15-20 years?
Sun February 04, 2018 4:39 am
Sun February 04, 2018 5:06 am
96583UP wrote:Foles is more naturally drawn to whites
Sun February 04, 2018 5:12 am
Sun February 04, 2018 12:40 pm
verb_to_trust wrote:I want the Pats to win every super bowl from here on out.
Sun February 04, 2018 12:42 pm
spike wrote:numbers wrote:And the entirety of their success has occurred in the parity era of the NFL, where the league is designed to discourage runs like this.
Except it hasn't worked in the AFC. Hasn't it been the Pats, Steelers, or Broncos representing the AFC in an inordinately weird amount of SBs over the last 15-20 years?
Sun February 04, 2018 1:14 pm
numbers wrote:spike wrote:numbers wrote:And the entirety of their success has occurred in the parity era of the NFL, where the league is designed to discourage runs like this.
Except it hasn't worked in the AFC. Hasn't it been the Pats, Steelers, or Broncos representing the AFC in an inordinately weird amount of SBs over the last 15-20 years?
I didn’t say it was working, but it’s been the goal of the NFL. In the Pats case, there have been multiple instances of the league changing rules specifically to make things harder for them.
Sun February 04, 2018 1:36 pm
96583UP wrote:Foles is more naturally drawn to whites
Sun February 04, 2018 2:20 pm
Coach wrote:numbers wrote:spike wrote:numbers wrote:And the entirety of their success has occurred in the parity era of the NFL, where the league is designed to discourage runs like this.
Except it hasn't worked in the AFC. Hasn't it been the Pats, Steelers, or Broncos representing the AFC in an inordinately weird amount of SBs over the last 15-20 years?
I didn’t say it was working, but it’s been the goal of the NFL. In the Pats case, there have been multiple instances of the league changing rules specifically to make things harder for them.
My favorite being when Polian cried about Colts receivers' lack of success vs. Pats DBs they changed the coverage rules to make it easier for Manning's receivers to get open.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/19/sport ... colts.html
Sun February 04, 2018 2:33 pm
numbers wrote:Coach wrote:numbers wrote:spike wrote:numbers wrote:And the entirety of their success has occurred in the parity era of the NFL, where the league is designed to discourage runs like this.
Except it hasn't worked in the AFC. Hasn't it been the Pats, Steelers, or Broncos representing the AFC in an inordinately weird amount of SBs over the last 15-20 years?
I didn’t say it was working, but it’s been the goal of the NFL. In the Pats case, there have been multiple instances of the league changing rules specifically to make things harder for them.
My favorite being when Polian cried about Colts receivers' lack of success vs. Pats DBs they changed the coverage rules to make it easier for Manning's receivers to get open.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/19/sport ... colts.html
Or when they banned jumping over the lines on FG block because the Patriots had a player that could actually do it.
Mon February 05, 2018 3:59 am
Mon February 05, 2018 4:00 am
verb_to_trust wrote:It's all downhill from here Pats fans