Switch to full style
Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post a reply

Re: New England Patriots

Mon February 06, 2017 5:19 am

--- wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
--- wrote:they went undefeated without gronkowski


I've heard some pretty plausible theories about the Pats maybe cutting ties with Gronk, but I think at this point they've got to hang onto him in case Brady suddenly dries up--he'd be a nice safety blanket for a young QB, even with how injury prone he is.

not sure they'll cut ties, but they need to bring in a viable alternative next year. i don't know how much more football gronk's body can take.

What they owe him next year vs. the cap hit for cutting him is about the same. So they'll keep him next year. It's the following year that gets interesting.

Re: New England Patriots

Mon February 06, 2017 6:23 am

Congrats Pats fans. That was one hell of a game!!!

Re: New England Patriots

Mon February 06, 2017 7:31 am

Electromatic wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:Brady should retire tonight.



Why he could win 2 more? He's got literally nothing else to live for.


Uh, Giselle??

Re: New England Patriots

Mon February 06, 2017 10:37 am

swan wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:Brady should retire tonight.



Why he could win 2 more? He's got literally nothing else to live for.


Uh, Giselle??

Being Tom Brady must be depressing as hell.

Re: New England Patriots

Mon February 06, 2017 12:53 pm

When you're Kevin Youkilis but you get to be in Brady family photos:

Re: New England Patriots

Mon February 06, 2017 2:50 pm

Someone stole Brady's game jersey from the locker room last night.

Re: New England Patriots

Mon February 13, 2017 7:29 pm

:wave:

Re: New England Patriots

Fri February 17, 2017 6:32 pm

TOM BRADY'S SUPER BOWL 51 COMEBACK TO BE MADE INTO BOOK AND FEATURE FILM


http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2693 ... ended_pool

Re: New England Patriots

Sat February 18, 2017 1:36 am

elliseamos wrote::wave:


:shake: this thread needed you!

Re: New England Patriots

Thu February 23, 2017 3:06 pm

Re: New England Patriots

Mon March 13, 2017 3:21 pm

So typical.

Re: New England Patriots

Mon March 13, 2017 3:36 pm

It looks like the Pats are going to let Hightower walk. That's a head-scratcher.

Re: New England Patriots

Tue March 14, 2017 12:27 am

I would hope that Hightower's visit to the Jets, upcoming visit to the Steelers, and anywhere else, yields high intelligence on AFC/NFC foes for the Pats. :lol:

Re: New England Patriots

Tue March 14, 2017 1:06 am

Simple Torture wrote:It looks like the Pats are going to let Hightower walk. That's a head-scratcher.
From what I'm reading, it's sounding like Hightower is getting other teams to bid for what the Patriots will ultimately will pay him. But I could be easily wrong about that guess.

Re: New England Patriots

Tue March 14, 2017 9:37 pm

He left Pitt without a contract.

Re: New England Patriots

Wed March 15, 2017 5:42 pm

Hightower is staying. Not so sure about Butler. I'd be inclined to keep him for this year, at least. But I'm not Bill. The guy just shows no emotion when it comes to the roster.

Re: New England Patriots

Wed March 15, 2017 6:07 pm

Hightower signed. 4 years 43.5 reported.

Re: New England Patriots

Wed March 15, 2017 6:57 pm

I've got to imagine that if Butler isn't traded, he's going to hold out.

Very happy with the Hightower signing. You're going to need that solid core of the defense with the newcomers and the people who are going.

Re: New England Patriots

Wed March 15, 2017 11:36 pm

At this point, if Bill has basically decided he's not signing Butler to a long term deal, it's better to get Cooks for him now rather than just watch him walk away in a year(or less if he holds out half the season.)

Re: New England Patriots

Thu March 16, 2017 1:04 am

Draft pick(s) for Butler and resigning Hightower. I would take that.
Post a reply