Have you changed your opinion since March, Spike?

digging up an RM2 post; this must've really been sticking in your craw.

wasn't that vereen's first playoff game? damn impressive

I think it's now safe to say that Belichick's strategy to go with two tight ends, who are charged with blocking and running routes and making catches akin to a star wideout, is a bust.

The strategy, when both all-world tight ends are healthy, is awesome.

However, Belichick failed to calculate the percentage increase in injury to his tight ends due to the overwhelming workload. It's asking too much - even of fine specimens in Gronk and Hernandez.

Now, the Pats are stuck without their two best offensive weapons (Hernandez's high ankle sprain is still a huge problem - read Greg? Bedard of the Globe) for the second straight Super Bowl run.

They can still get there and win it, but they'll need a strong Plan B. Is it Vareen and Ridley? Perhaps so...

Wut?

Yeah, I don't get this at all either. Tony Gonzalez would also likely disagree.

I... I just... I'm trying not to post in this forum until the Pat's season is over. Damn you, Coach.

Not only does it work for the Pats, but several other teams as well. I'm gonna have to go with a big "disagree" on that.

#1, i didn't know who had written it, i just remembered somebody posting it.
#2, answer the question.

The point is the offense - at it's most dominant form - depends on two healthy ultra superstar tight ends, who are asked to do more than your average tight end (catch a 50 yard bomb, line up as a full back, etc.). The the odds of at least one of the two high flying TEs getting injured is too great given their risky behavior on the field....by risky, I mean physically demanding.

Check out last year's Super Bowl, where an unhealthy Gronk made the difference.

I'd argue that you will rarely see a healthy Gronk and Hernandez on the field together anytime soon. The high ankle sprain that Hernandez is playing on could set him back a whole season. I admire his guts out there, though.

breaking news: people get hurt playing football

and some players are injury prone more so than others

so if i'm to read you right, coach, you'd prefer Belichick built his team around scrubs and avoided drafting superstars just so he wouldn't have to depend on them? ask San Diego how that's working out.

Coach, you build your team the best you can with the best personnel available. Players get hurt, and the Patriots mentality has always been "next guy up." It sucks going forward without Gronk, but they've played a third of the season without him, and it's obvious that he probably should not have been out on the field to begin with. The way he was moving against Miami I had a feeling that this (season) wasn't going to end well for him.

The Patriots won't be able to use their entire playbook without him, but that's okay. It's a matter of putting together a game plan that is effective. I have no doubts that the Pats will be able to put up points against Baltimore, their defense is not nearly what people think it is. It's somewhere in the middle of the league, not elite.

The Patriots biggest issues will be limiting Flacco's deep throws up the sides. He's been very effective doing that. Of course Jim Caldwell is not the most creative playcaller in the world, so I like that advantage that NE has.

I think the point spread for this game is far too high, if I was betting I'd take the 9 points and be happy. I think the Patriots win, but I think it's going to be a very competitive game. Baltimore has no fear, which I love about them, and they'll come in and play well. I think the Patriots win, 31-27.

FYI

Pats fans, I feel for you. Baltimore really fucked shit up in the AFC this year, huh?

yup. congrats to them. still not sure why Belichick didn't sign Pollard when he had the chance. That guy has ruined 4 seasons for this team.

i could understand 1 or 2 of those, but 12? that seems forced.

fucking talib