Red Mosquito
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/

The Green Bay Packers
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=458
Page 5 of 36

Author:  Lament [ Fri December 20, 2013 9:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

spike wrote:
potential ridiculous SNOW GAME in green bay sunday


Let's hope so. Roll Eddie, Roll...

If it isn't a ridiculous snow game, let's hope McCarthy has learned his lesson from the past two weeks and opens up the passing game in the first half a bit, instead of waiting until the second half like he did against Atlanta and Dallas.

Author:  Chris_H_2 [ Fri December 20, 2013 10:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Lament wrote:
spike wrote:
potential ridiculous SNOW GAME in green bay sunday


Let's hope so. Roll Eddie, Roll...

If it isn't a ridiculous snow game, let's hope McCarthy has learned his lesson from the past two weeks and opens up the passing game in the first half a bit, instead of waiting until the second half like he did against Atlanta and Dallas.


Just realize that Pittsburgh's defense is a wee bit better than Atlanta's and Dallas's.

Author:  Lament [ Fri December 20, 2013 10:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Chris_H_2 wrote:
Just realize that Pittsburgh's defense is a wee bit better than Atlanta's and Dallas's.


Only a wee bit better, though. Atlanta is the worst of the three, giving up 27.7 points per game. Pittsburgh is still giving up 23.7. This isn't a robust Super Bowl-era Steelers defense that you're lucky to put up more than two touchdowns against. A Ryan Tannehill-led Miami team just hung 34 on them two weeks ago.

Author:  Chris_H_2 [ Fri December 20, 2013 10:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Lament wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Just realize that Pittsburgh's defense is a wee bit better than Atlanta's and Dallas's.


Only a wee bit better, though. Atlanta is the worst of the three, giving up 27.7 points per game. Pittsburgh is still giving up 23.7. This isn't a robust Super Bowl-era Steelers defense that you're lucky to put up more than two touchdowns against. A Ryan Tannehill-led Miami team just hung 34 on them two weeks ago.


I was using the Steelers more of a suggestion of how bad Atlanta's and Dallas's defenses are as opposed to how much better the Steelers' defense is.

Either way, the Packers should be able to score plenty on them.

Author:  Harry Lime [ Sat December 21, 2013 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

I can't believe Rodgers will be missing his 7th straight, and yet there is still hope for this team. What a shitty division.

Author:  Fuck You Jobu [ Sat December 21, 2013 2:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Harry Lime wrote:
I can't believe Rodgers will be missing his 7th straight, and yet there is still hope for this team. What a shitty division.


Well the Bears were without their QB and more than 1/2 their def starters and 3 pro-bowlers. But yeah Det and Minn are shit.

Author:  Kaius [ Sat December 21, 2013 7:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Harry Lime wrote:
I can't believe Rodgers will be missing his 7th straight, and yet there is still hope for this team. What a shitty division.

I think it says more about the quality of opponents they've faced, rather than how other North teams have played...?

Author:  Lament [ Sat December 21, 2013 8:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Harry Lime wrote:
I can't believe Rodgers will be missing his 7th straight, and yet there is still hope for this team. What a shitty division.


I'm with you Harry. This will effectively be the eighth game the most dominant player this division has seen since its inception (don't kid yourself otherwise, Rodgers is 26-6 against the division in games he's played more than half of, and four of those losses were by three or less points) , and somehow they still control their own destiny.

Author:  spike [ Sun December 22, 2013 10:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Fuck You Jobu wrote:
Harry Lime wrote:
I can't believe Rodgers will be missing his 7th straight, and yet there is still hope for this team. What a shitty division.


Well the Bears were without their QB and more than 1/2 their def starters and 3 pro-bowlers. But yeah Det and Minn are shit.

all of whom are a lot easier to replace than aaron rodgers. the packers have also been playing without bulaga, finley, and cobb most of the year, and plenty of key defensive players have missed substantial time.

Author:  Fuck You Jobu [ Mon December 23, 2013 12:24 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

spike wrote:
Fuck You Jobu wrote:
Harry Lime wrote:
I can't believe Rodgers will be missing his 7th straight, and yet there is still hope for this team. What a shitty division.


Well the Bears were without their QB and more than 1/2 their def starters and 3 pro-bowlers. But yeah Det and Minn are shit.

all of whom are a lot easier to replace than aaron rodgers. the packers have also been playing without bulaga, finley, and cobb most of the year, and plenty of key defensive players have missed substantial time.


My point was that MN and DET are horrible and the Bears ravaged by injuries, not to get in to an injury pissing match.

Author:  spike [ Mon December 23, 2013 12:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Fuck You Jobu wrote:
spike wrote:
Fuck You Jobu wrote:
Harry Lime wrote:
I can't believe Rodgers will be missing his 7th straight, and yet there is still hope for this team. What a shitty division.


Well the Bears were without their QB and more than 1/2 their def starters and 3 pro-bowlers. But yeah Det and Minn are shit.

all of whom are a lot easier to replace than aaron rodgers. the packers have also been playing without bulaga, finley, and cobb most of the year, and plenty of key defensive players have missed substantial time.


My point was that MN and DET are horrible and the Bears ravaged by injuries, not to get in to an injury pissing match.

sure sounded like you were making excuses for the bears. while valid, just wanted to remind you that they're not the only ones depleted.

Author:  spike [ Mon December 23, 2013 12:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

welp, go eagles.

Author:  Fuck You Jobu [ Mon December 23, 2013 12:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

spike wrote:
Fuck You Jobu wrote:
spike wrote:
Fuck You Jobu wrote:
Harry Lime wrote:
I can't believe Rodgers will be missing his 7th straight, and yet there is still hope for this team. What a shitty division.


Well the Bears were without their QB and more than 1/2 their def starters and 3 pro-bowlers. But yeah Det and Minn are shit.

all of whom are a lot easier to replace than aaron rodgers. the packers have also been playing without bulaga, finley, and cobb most of the year, and plenty of key defensive players have missed substantial time.


My point was that MN and DET are horrible and the Bears ravaged by injuries, not to get in to an injury pissing match.

sure sounded like you were making excuses for the bears. while valid, just wanted to remind you that they're not the only ones depleted.


:roll: I said I didn't want to get into an injury pissing match and you keep trying to do it.

Author:  spike [ Mon December 23, 2013 12:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

wait a minute...

Author:  Fuck You Jobu [ Mon December 23, 2013 12:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Wow, that was close! Great game. Nelson was wide open on that final play.

Author:  EJ [ Mon December 23, 2013 1:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Forte>Starks>Lacy

Author:  spike [ Mon December 23, 2013 1:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

packers beat themselves badly today

Author:  Lament [ Mon December 23, 2013 10:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

EJ wrote:
Forte>Starks>Lacy


So where does LeSean McCoy fit into this?

Author:  Kaius [ Mon December 23, 2013 1:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Lament wrote:
EJ wrote:
Forte>Starks>Lacy


So where does LeSean McCoy fit into this?

The end zone

Author:  warehouse [ Mon December 23, 2013 1:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Green Bay Packers

Lament wrote:
EJ wrote:
Forte>Starks>Lacy


So where does LeSean McCoy fit into this?

probably right behind peterson and infront of everyone else

Page 5 of 36 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/