The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
The key question that I've yet to see a satisfactory answer on this, however, is whether this has any impact on the current logo, color scheme, or anything else associated with the Redskins. If it doesn't (and reading the ruling, I don't think it does), I don't see how this will practically stop Dan Snyder from the ability to exclusively sell Redskins merchandise, which is the goal of this fight in the first place. Sure, maybe you could distribute T-shirts with just the Redskins name, but if you can't include the logo as well, it's pretty meaningless.
The key question that I've yet to see a satisfactory answer on this, however, is whether this has any impact on the current logo, color scheme, or anything else associated with the Redskins. If it doesn't (and reading the ruling, I don't think it does), I don't see how this will practically stop Dan Snyder from the ability to exclusively sell Redskins merchandise, which is the goal of this fight in the first place. Sure, maybe you could distribute T-shirts with just the Redskins name, but if you can't include the logo as well, it's pretty meaningless.
Basically, the team will appeal, which will allow them to still sell all manners of shit with the logo while the appeal is in process
They'd be better off just changing the name now and avoiding all of this horseshit
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm Posts: 6932
MattA75 wrote:
Basically, the team will appeal, which will allow them to still sell all manners of shit with the logo while the appeal is in process
But even if they lose the appeal, I don't see how it means anything in the end if only the name is unprotected. Most Redskins fans are going to want the whole deal (logo, colors, etc.).
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out and how it affects the other professional teams in similar situations. The Cleveland Indians have already pretty much phased out their unbelievably racist Chief Wahoo logo, and the Chicago Blackhawks don't seem to receive nearly the same amount of flak for their name/logo.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Green Habit wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
Basically, the team will appeal, which will allow them to still sell all manners of shit with the logo while the appeal is in process
But even if they lose the appeal, I don't see how it means anything in the end if only the name is unprotected. Most Redskins fans are going to want the whole deal (logo, colors, etc.).
NPR today made it sound like the logo itself wasn't exclusive to the team anymore. They could be wrong though, or I could have misheard it.
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm Posts: 6932
philpritchard wrote:
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out and how it affects the other professional teams in similar situations. The Cleveland Indians have already pretty much phased out their unbelievably racist Chief Wahoo logo, and the Chicago Blackhawks don't seem to receive nearly the same amount of flak for their name/logo.
The Indians seem to have done a good job launching a preemptive strike against Chief Wahoo to avoid entering a circle of PR hell.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out and how it affects the other professional teams in similar situations. The Cleveland Indians have already pretty much phased out their unbelievably racist Chief Wahoo logo, and the Chicago Blackhawks don't seem to receive nearly the same amount of flak for their name/logo.
The Indians seem to have done a good job launching a preemptive strike against Chief Wahoo to avoid entering a circle of PR hell.
One, the history of that mascot is not important. Two it doesn't harm a team to change it because several teams have done that before due to changing cities what have you
It trivializes a group of people and that's wrong whether or not you find it racist.
Change all of the names.
Last edited by Electromatic on Wed June 18, 2014 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
FSU has the permission of several high ranking members of the Seminole Tribe of Florida. However, the majority of Seminole descendants were/are outside of Florida (mostly in Oklahoma), and there's a lot of opposition to the use of the name among them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum