Switch to full style
Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post a reply

Re: MLB

Sun February 10, 2013 12:20 am

@SkitchP wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
Brainof23 wrote:PED's suck. They suck the life out of baseball discussions like this and sucked the life out of the Hall of Fame induction ceremomy this summer.

Next year on the other hand, 3 guys not linked to PED's should go in together as first ballot guys.

Maddux, Glavine, Thomas

Maddux has an outside shot to be the first unanimous inductee but some baseball writter will leave him off his ballot to try and be a part of the story. A Maddux PED scandal would crush me more than any other player. Maddux, Griffey, and Jeter need to stay clean for me.

Glavine obviously made the right decision to chose baseball over hockey. It's too bad Smoltz can't go in with Maddux and Glavine.

Thomas is a notch below Maddux/Glavine in my HOF but a deserving player. It wouldn't shock me if the writers make him wait a year and get Biggio in.


The idea that Frank Thomas should have to wait for Craig Biggio is ridiculous...Biggio doesn't belong there at all, nevermind before Frank Thomas


pfft. Arent you the same guy that said Whitaker doesn't belong?


yeah...and aside from Biggio having a lot more hits, their statistics are very comparable...and not once when watching either of them did I ever think "that guy is a hall of famer"

but hey, if Biggio gets in, I don't know how you can't give Whitaker a lot more consideration

Re: MLB

Sun February 10, 2013 1:41 am

:?

Re: MLB

Sun February 10, 2013 1:45 am

MattA75 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
Brainof23 wrote:PED's suck. They suck the life out of baseball discussions like this and sucked the life out of the Hall of Fame induction ceremomy this summer.

Next year on the other hand, 3 guys not linked to PED's should go in together as first ballot guys.

Maddux, Glavine, Thomas

Maddux has an outside shot to be the first unanimous inductee but some baseball writter will leave him off his ballot to try and be a part of the story. A Maddux PED scandal would crush me more than any other player. Maddux, Griffey, and Jeter need to stay clean for me.

Glavine obviously made the right decision to chose baseball over hockey. It's too bad Smoltz can't go in with Maddux and Glavine.

Thomas is a notch below Maddux/Glavine in my HOF but a deserving player. It wouldn't shock me if the writers make him wait a year and get Biggio in.


The idea that Frank Thomas should have to wait for Craig Biggio is ridiculous...Biggio doesn't belong there at all, nevermind before Frank Thomas


pfft. Arent you the same guy that said Whitaker doesn't belong?


yeah...and aside from Biggio having a lot more hits, their statistics are very comparable...and not once when watching either of them did I ever think "that guy is a hall of famer"

but hey, if Biggio gets in, I don't know how you can't give Whitaker a lot more consideration


he's black, duh.

Re: MLB

Sun February 10, 2013 2:35 am

numbers wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
Brainof23 wrote:PED's suck. They suck the life out of baseball discussions like this and sucked the life out of the Hall of Fame induction ceremomy this summer.

Next year on the other hand, 3 guys not linked to PED's should go in together as first ballot guys.

Maddux, Glavine, Thomas

Maddux has an outside shot to be the first unanimous inductee but some baseball writter will leave him off his ballot to try and be a part of the story. A Maddux PED scandal would crush me more than any other player. Maddux, Griffey, and Jeter need to stay clean for me.

Glavine obviously made the right decision to chose baseball over hockey. It's too bad Smoltz can't go in with Maddux and Glavine.

Thomas is a notch below Maddux/Glavine in my HOF but a deserving player. It wouldn't shock me if the writers make him wait a year and get Biggio in.


The idea that Frank Thomas should have to wait for Craig Biggio is ridiculous...Biggio doesn't belong there at all, nevermind before Frank Thomas


pfft. Arent you the same guy that said Whitaker doesn't belong?


yeah...and aside from Biggio having a lot more hits, their statistics are very comparable...and not once when watching either of them did I ever think "that guy is a hall of famer"

but hey, if Biggio gets in, I don't know how you can't give Whitaker a lot more consideration


he's black, duh.



In terms of WAR type stats, Whitaker is above Alomar, and really close to Sandberg.

Re: MLB

Mon February 11, 2013 12:00 am

Any other sox fans think its funny that Pedro showed up early for spring training?

Re: MLB

Mon February 11, 2013 2:29 am

Yeah I got a chuckle out of that.

Re: MLB

Mon February 11, 2013 2:47 am

Martinez?

Re: MLB

Mon February 11, 2013 2:48 am

No, the other Pedro.

Re: MLB

Mon February 11, 2013 2:51 am

oh stfu. i asked cause why the fuck is he in camp?

Re: MLB

Mon February 11, 2013 2:56 am

Sox hired him as a "special assistant to the GM". I guess he'll be working with young pitchers.

Re: MLB

Mon February 11, 2013 3:07 am

AL

Re: MLB

Sun February 17, 2013 11:34 pm

So, Ryan Brauns "excuse" was, that he used the guy from Miami as a consultant for his appeals case...

Its now believed from MLB insiders, that the possible leak for his positive test result, was someone from Florida, he used as a consultant...

which begs a few questions...

If the consultant, wanted more money than his advice was worth, so Brauns lawyers told him get lost... the consultant than leaked the news of the positive test? Why did Braun's lawyers not go after him? the logical explanation is, because Brauns team of lawyers know, that this guy in Miami has the dirt on Braun to sink his whole story.

the ironic part of the whole story, appears to be, that because of the miami guy leaking the information, MLB investigated the leak... and may have taken down another steroid ring...

needless to say, theres ALOT more going on here
Brauns an idiot if he thinks he can get away with just that one press release this time.

Re: MLB

Mon February 18, 2013 1:37 am

Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.

Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.

Re: MLB

Mon February 18, 2013 11:10 am

verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.

Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.


The Os are coming in fifth

Re: MLB

Mon February 18, 2013 10:14 pm

verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.

Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.


Jays are taking the AL East... thanks for trying :)

Re: MLB

Tue February 19, 2013 9:44 pm

MattA75 wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.

Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.


The Os are coming in fifth


I think that's what most people are expecting.

Re: MLB

Tue February 19, 2013 10:12 pm

philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.

Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.


The Os are coming in fifth


I think that's what most people are expecting.


I dunno about that, a lot of people seem to have Boston there

Re: MLB

Tue February 19, 2013 11:06 pm

MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.

Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.


The Os are coming in fifth


I think that's what most people are expecting.


I dunno about that, a lot of people seem to have Boston there


Vegas has them at about 76 wins. That seems about right, considering they were the luckiest team in baseball last year.

Re: MLB

Wed February 20, 2013 5:33 pm

MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.

Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.


The Os are coming in fifth


I think that's what most people are expecting.


I dunno about that, a lot of people seem to have Boston there


Maybe... Boston still has a lot of huge question marks, but I think there's more talent there than the Orioles have. I hate to admit it after the offseason the Jays just had, but anything can happen in the AL East this year. I think the only thing that would surprise me would be the Rays finishing last.

Re: MLB

Wed February 20, 2013 9:38 pm

philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Braun is dirty and has a big googly eyed baby head.

Yanks should struggle a little this year, yeah? Their core is getting old. Still have Cano, Tex, CC, ect. but it'd be nice to see the O's take the AL East.


The Os are coming in fifth


I think that's what most people are expecting.


I dunno about that, a lot of people seem to have Boston there


Maybe... Boston still has a lot of huge question marks, but I think there's more talent there than the Orioles have. I hate to admit it after the offseason the Jays just had, but anything can happen in the AL East this year. I think the only thing that would surprise me would be the Rays finishing last.


I think the Jays rotation and the Boston rotation is very similar in terms of question marks...if everything works out for the Jays they'll be great but I don't think it's a certainty
Post a reply