The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22403
Chris_H_2 wrote:
96583UP wrote:
Does Andy Reid call the plays or Nagy ?
reid
ah right
the whole thing on why Bienemy is not considered a real person
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22403
Bammer wrote:
The annoying smart kid from Full House grew up to become the owner of the Kansas City Chiefs.
‘Merica!
LOL
some owners you like to see happy when their team wins
this guy just looks like he's got it so great
tough to root for
not bad enough to hate
but i would rather see an old timer like the Falcons owner get one
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Nantz and Romo def thought the Chiefs weren't going to snap it before first OT ran out.
The script called for double OT
Ok so someone explain this to me
Romo confirmed saying something like.. if you guys were wondering why kc isn't calling any timeouts, it just rolls into a second ot
..but was he correct in saying that? I could see if there was a tie, but how do the niners not win if they're winning and the clock runs down to zero? What's the point of even having a clock then?
Nantz and Romo def thought the Chiefs weren't going to snap it before first OT ran out.
The script called for double OT
Ok so someone explain this to me
Romo confirmed saying something like.. if you guys were wondering why kc isn't calling any timeouts, it just rolls into a second ot
..but was he correct in saying that? I could see if there was a tie, but how do the niners not win if they're winning and the clock runs down to zero? What's the point of even having a clock then?
He was correct. There shouldn't be a clock either. Just make it like college OT where you only have the play clock and down/distance.
Nantz and Romo def thought the Chiefs weren't going to snap it before first OT ran out.
The script called for double OT
Ok so someone explain this to me
Romo confirmed saying something like.. if you guys were wondering why kc isn't calling any timeouts, it just rolls into a second ot
..but was he correct in saying that? I could see if there was a tie, but how do the niners not win if they're winning and the clock runs down to zero? What's the point of even having a clock then?
He was correct. There shouldn't be a clock either. Just make it like college OT where you only have the play clock and down/distance.
Equity in kicking direction over 30 minutes of playtime
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22403
they should play two 8 minute halves in the superbowl for OT
and then go to the shootout afterward if it's still tied
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm Posts: 32520 Location: Where everybody knows your name
i got bugs wrote:
Mecca wrote:
spike wrote:
Nantz and Romo def thought the Chiefs weren't going to snap it before first OT ran out.
The script called for double OT
Ok so someone explain this to me
Romo confirmed saying something like.. if you guys were wondering why kc isn't calling any timeouts, it just rolls into a second ot
..but was he correct in saying that? I could see if there was a tie, but how do the niners not win if they're winning and the clock runs down to zero? What's the point of even having a clock then?
He was. As they explained it and the referee explained it before the OT cointoss, it was a new ball game. 15-minute periods. So, in this instance, if the Chiefs just let the clock expire, a new period would begin because they were still in their first OT possession.
_________________ Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing! - C. Montgomery Burns
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22403
too much focus on SF taking the ball in OT
their offense was flat for many drives in the game
their defense did give them a chance to win it
was a tough game, a good battle
the more special player won
happens
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
