The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
Got a trade proposal this morning: Eckler for Adams, straight up. My RBs have been so rough that I'm thinking about it..
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Last edited by Mickey on Sun September 22, 2019 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
Current RBs are Fournette and Johnson (Sanders, Barber, and Murray on the bench). WRs are Adams, Beckham Jr., and Hilton, who's been parked in my flex
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
Eked out a win with that sack on the final play of the Bears game. Allah truly is good.
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Got a trade proposal this morning: Eckler for Adams, straight up. My RBs have been so rough that I'm thinking about it..
Wait... someone is offering you Eckler for Adams?
You absolutely take that trade. Adams will probably improve over the season and maybe Melvin Gordon comes back but Eckler is the best fantasy back in the league. And WR's are easier to stream. 100% I'd take that trade.
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Got a trade proposal this morning: Eckler for Adams, straight up. My RBs have been so rough that I'm thinking about it..
Wait... someone is offering you Eckler for Adams?
You absolutely take that trade. Adams will probably improve over the season and maybe Melvin Gordon comes back but Eckler is the best fantasy back in the league. And WR's are easier to stream. 100% I'd take that trade.
I let it expire. I'd absolutely trade Adams but not for Eckler, too much unknown there
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
Ahem, Joseph
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
This week's points don't mean as much to me as Gordon coming back. That's the much bigger deal regarding the previous trade talk. You made the right move, not because of last night, but because I was gambling on the likelihood of Gordon pulling a Lev Bell and sitting all year.
I stand by my call under if Gordon stayed sidelined.
I just noticed my opponent this week is in violation of league rules. Technically, he could adjust his line-up so that he's no longer in violation by kick-off on Sunday. If he doesn't, then he loses points. I'm conflicted about this on several levels:
1. Am I under any obligation to tell him now? 2. Should I notify the commissioner now? 3. If I notify any other league-mates is that collusion? 4. A game was already played this week, does that mean he shouldn't be able to adjust anything? 5. The specific issue is that you can't roster, let alone play, 2 Chiefs players. He has Hardman and Butker in his lineup now. They shouldn't both even be ROSTERED. So even if he benches one of them, he's still in violation of the rules. But assuming he doesn't adjust his lineup, which player's points should the commissioner deduct?
Obviously, the difference in potential points between Hardman and Butker is substantial. You guys have any thoughts on how to deal with this?
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mickey wrote:
Ahem, Joseph
This week's points don't mean as much to me as Gordon coming back. That's the much bigger deal regarding the previous trade talk. You made the right move, not because of last night, but because I was gambling on the likelihood of Gordon pulling a Lev Bell and sitting all year.
I stand by my call under if Gordon stayed sidelined.
Oh definitely. The same guy tried to offer me John Ross for Aaron Rodgers btw.
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
durdencommatyler wrote:
I just noticed my opponent this week is in violation of league rules. Technically, he could adjust his line-up so that he's no longer in violation by kick-off on Sunday. If he doesn't, then he loses points. I'm conflicted about this on several levels:
1. Am I under any obligation to tell him now? 2. Should I notify the commissioner now? 3. If I notify any other league-mates is that collusion? 4. A game was already played this week, does that mean he shouldn't be able to adjust anything? 5. The specific issue is that you can't roster, let alone play, 2 Chiefs players. He has Hardman and Butker in his lineup now. They shouldn't both even be ROSTERED. So even if he benches one of them, he's still in violation of the rules. But assuming he doesn't adjust his lineup, which player's points should the commissioner deduct?
Obviously, the difference in potential points between Hardman and Butker is substantial. You guys have any thoughts on how to deal with this?
Yeah, get rid of that dumb rule.
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
This week's points don't mean as much to me as Gordon coming back. That's the much bigger deal regarding the previous trade talk. You made the right move, not because of last night, but because I was gambling on the likelihood of Gordon pulling a Lev Bell and sitting all year.
I stand by my call under if Gordon stayed sidelined.
Oh definitely. The same guy tried to offer me John Ross for Aaron Rodgers btw.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum