Red Mosquito • View topic

epilogue · **Posted:** Sun February 07, 2021 9:26 pm

96583UP wrote:

KC is super dynamic but just so good it’s almost boring to watch

kinda like the 90s Bulls - you get sick of them constantly winning

Does

Not

Compute

epilogue · **Posted:** Wed February 10, 2021 7:02 pm

First Tampa Bay murders the Chiefs' offense. Then Marty Schottenheimer passed. Now Terez Paylor...

Fuck...

Rough few days for KC fans.

RIP :peace:

epilogue · **Posted:** Wed February 10, 2021 7:48 pm

Good content right here.

epilogue · **Posted:** Thu March 11, 2021 4:46 pm

KC releases both Swartz and Fisher.

We have no starting tackles. Which, as we saw in the Super Bowl, is exactly how you win championships.

Awesome.

lennytheweedwhacker · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm **Posts:** 42179

E.H. Ruddock · **Joined:** Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm **Posts:** 47316

96583UP · **Joined:** Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am **Posts:** 22323

haha saw this thread and just knew that was coming

elliseamos · **Posted:** Fri March 12, 2021 3:22 am

This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.

epilogue · **Posted:** Fri March 12, 2021 2:06 pm

elliseamos wrote:

This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.

I think this one plays out just a little differently. But I guess time will tell.

elliseamos · **Posted:** Fri March 12, 2021 8:21 pm

epilogue wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.

I think this one plays out just a little differently. But I guess time will tell.

Which one of Hill or Kelce will play the role of Beast Mode?

epilogue · **Posted:** Fri March 12, 2021 8:42 pm

elliseamos wrote:

epilogue wrote:

elliseamos wrote:

This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.

I think this one plays out just a little differently. But I guess time will tell.

Which one of Hill or Kelce will play the role of Beast Mode?

Ha!

Have to be Kelce.

epilogue · **Posted:** Fri March 12, 2021 8:47 pm

Veach always has a plan.

E.H. Ruddock · **Joined:** Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm **Posts:** 47316

He’s just copying Brady.

96583UP · **Joined:** Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am **Posts:** 22323

E.H. Ruddock · **Joined:** Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm **Posts:** 47316

Bammer · **Posted:** Sat March 13, 2021 3:16 am

Does this impact the anount of money he is being paid? I don’t understand. Why wouldn’t everyone do this every chance they get?

96583UP · **Joined:** Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am **Posts:** 22323

i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front

cash flow

Bammer · **Posted:** Sat March 13, 2021 3:34 am

96583UP wrote:

i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front

cash flow

Ok yeah I think that makes sense. Risk paying now, non-refundable, guy gets hurt or whatever and keeps the money.

Why would the player ever resist doing this?

Why do they make it sound like the player is helping the team by doing this?

96583UP · **Joined:** Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am **Posts:** 22323

Bammer wrote:

96583UP wrote:

i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front

cash flow

Ok yeah I think that makes sense. Risk paying now, non-refundable, guy gets hurt or whatever and keeps the money.

Why would the player ever resist doing this?

Why do they make it sound like the player is helping the team by doing this?

i don't know why a player would resist - maybe bc their agent gets a cut so it's a net loss after transaction fees

they are helping the team bc it allows them to manage the salary cap better

to hire more players to get injured right before the superbowl so pat mahomes can play with an injured toe behind britt reid at LT

Bammer · **Posted:** Sat March 13, 2021 3:45 am

96583UP wrote:

Bammer wrote:

96583UP wrote:

i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front

cash flow

Ok yeah I think that makes sense. Risk paying now, non-refundable, guy gets hurt or whatever and keeps the money.

Why would the player ever resist doing this?

Why do they make it sound like the player is helping the team by doing this?

i don't know why a player would resist - maybe bc their agent gets a cut so it's a net loss after transaction fees

they are helping the team bc it allows them to manage the salary cap better

to hire more players to get injured right before the superbowl so pat mahomes can play with an injured toe behind britt reid at LT

I mean, they praise the player for doing it. Like he’s a martyr or something.

Sounds like a slam dunk for the player and absolutely no reason ever not to do it. Fuck the fkn agent.

Kansas City Chiefs

Who is online