The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am Posts: 9712 Location: Tristes Tropiques
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Hypothetical, how many times would Brady have been sacked if the QBs switches teams?
A billion times. I had a feeling those o-line injuries would be important but I definitely didn't think it'd be like this.
_________________
VinylGuy wrote:
its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22393
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
96583UP wrote:
wow 3-way sack sandwich ouch
how was that roughing?
seriously
more like getting roughed up
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22393
that streaker looked hilarious i wish they would show more
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22393
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
dad wrote:
why is the old guy raping the large player?
fatty wouldn't consent, so he took what he wanted
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22393
Bammer wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Who will be MVP?
Gronk me baby
it's def gonna be Brady
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22393
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
Bammer wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Who will be MVP?
Gronk me baby
nope it should be the whole Tampa Bay defense
that's why it will be Brady
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22393
Bammer wrote:
96583UP wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
Bammer wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Who will be MVP?
Gronk me baby
nope it should be the whole Tampa Bay defense
that's why it will be Brady
Yep. Exactly. Can’t pick one guy.
they should give Brady a few plays at D-line and see if he can get a sack
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22393
wease wrote:
96583UP wrote:
wease wrote:
96583UP wrote:
wease wrote:
Welp. That’s it. KC is done.
still a lot of time left with their offense. but they do need to catch a break with a turnover or big play to get a spark and get back in this
Nah. TB scores again and that pick ruined the offense.
me and Tony Romo both can't count but Jim Nantz said the lead is 22 which with over a quarter left KC is still viable for
they just need to find their chi
Told ya
they never found their chi
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
