The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am Posts: 22 Location: UP NORTH
Monkey_Driven wrote:
A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
In the current system, they both deserve to be there.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
In the current system, they both deserve to be there.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.
Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am Posts: 22 Location: UP NORTH
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
In the current system, they both deserve to be there.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.
A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
In the current system, they both deserve to be there.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.
Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am Posts: 22 Location: UP NORTH
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
In the current system, they both deserve to be there.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.
Nah. Make conferences matter again.
Why reward shitty conferences?
The cream will rise to the top anyway. Does it matter if it's a 2 loss Texas A&M or a 2 loss Wake Forest?
A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
In the current system, they both deserve to be there.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.
Nah. Make conferences matter again.
Why reward shitty conferences?
The cream will rise to the top anyway. Does it matter if it's a 2 loss Texas A&M or a 2 loss Wake Forest?
Yes, because Texas A&M would at least have the potential for a competitive first round game.
Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am Posts: 22 Location: UP NORTH
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Athletic Supporter wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
In the current system, they both deserve to be there.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.
Nah. Make conferences matter again.
Why reward shitty conferences?
The cream will rise to the top anyway. Does it matter if it's a 2 loss Texas A&M or a 2 loss Wake Forest?
Yes, because Texas A&M would at least have the potential for a competitive first round game.
Let's just have a SEC tournament and everyone else fights for scraps.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
