Red Mosquito • View topic

BigRedLedbetter · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 2:50 am

PHATJ wrote:

Kent Hrbek. Such a great player, and so underrated nationally.

Agreed. But.....

PHATJ · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 2:58 am

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

Kent Hrbek. Such a great player, and so underrated nationally.

Agreed. But.....

That makes him even better. F Ron Gant!

BigRedLedbetter · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 3:13 am

PHATJ wrote:

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

Kent Hrbek. Such a great player, and so underrated nationally.

Agreed. But.....

That makes him even better. F Ron Gant!

I will just always remember that play haha. I was like 10-11ish. I was like what the hell just happened?

PHATJ · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 6:54 am

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

PHATJ wrote:

Kent Hrbek. Such a great player, and so underrated nationally.

Agreed. But.....

That makes him even better. F Ron Gant!

I will just always remember that play haha. I was like 10-11ish. I was like what the hell just happened?

I'll tell you what happened, he secured legend status.

Lament · **Joined:** Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am **Posts:** 11792

Monkey_Driven wrote:

On the subject of uniforms, I loved the throwbacks Oregon wore last year.

Damn. Those are fucking great.

PHATJ wrote:

The Twins might be my second-least favorite team in all of baseball, but this a really good looking uniform. I normally am not a fan of navy and red, but the powder blue makes it work for me.

Strat wrote:

I just read this thread title. NEver seen it before. Didnt read a single fucking post in here because why should i? Lament is awesome. This is perfect.

I

you, Strat.

darth_vedder · **Joined:** Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm **Posts:** 6334

Those Twins unis are great.

On a similar note, I always loved these:

Lament · **Joined:** Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am **Posts:** 11792

I always felt like the powder blues were important for keeping the Royals from looking too much like the Dodgers. I wish they'd go back to them full-time on the road.

BigRedLedbetter · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 7:08 pm

Powder blue jersey, royal blue hat and gray pants with high blue socks on the road would be sharp.

I do love this road hat of theirs though.

Lament · **Joined:** Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am **Posts:** 11792

I think I liked when they had Kansas City across their chest like this...

more than the script. If they had this with a button-down (instead of a pullover), that'd be a step up from their current road look.

BigRedLedbetter · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 9:13 pm

Yes. I am a big fan of "team name" on the front at home and "city" on the front on the road.

@SkitchP · **Joined:** Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm **Posts:** 9875

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

Yes. I am a big fan of "team name" on the front at home and "city" on the front on the road.

Team name is not required

BigRedLedbetter · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 9:31 pm

@SkitchP wrote:

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

Yes. I am a big fan of "team name" on the front at home and "city" on the front on the road.

Team name is not required

Agreed. I don't believe it's a MLB requirement either. I like when teams have different uniforms for road and home. Maybe this could have been more clear.

Example....

BurtReynolds · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 9:35 pm

if it ain't black, its wack.

@SkitchP · **Joined:** Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm **Posts:** 9875

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

Yes. I am a big fan of "team name" on the front at home and "city" on the front on the road.

Team name is not required

Agreed. I don't believe it's a MLB requirement either. I like when teams have different uniforms for road and home. Maybe this could have been more clear.

Example....

Spoiler: show

Oh, I know what you meant. but nothing tops one that has neither the city or team name

BigRedLedbetter · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 9:45 pm

@SkitchP wrote:

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

@SkitchP wrote:

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

Yes. I am a big fan of "team name" on the front at home and "city" on the front on the road.

Team name is not required

Agreed. I don't believe it's a MLB requirement either. I like when teams have different uniforms for road and home. Maybe this could have been more clear.

Example....

Spoiler: show

Oh, I know what you meant. but nothing tops one that has neither the city or team name

Right. That is a classic logo though from an old time team. Everyone knows that logo. Little old ladies in Flint know that logo. It would look and does look rather stupid if a newer team did it.

This was a disaster.

@SkitchP · **Joined:** Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm **Posts:** 9875

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

Right. That is a classic logo though from an old time team. Everyone knows that logo. Little old ladies in Flint know that logo. It would look and does look rather stupid if a newer team did it.

This was a disaster.

Ugh, I hated that sleeveless look when it took over the league briefly.

BigRedLedbetter · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 10:06 pm

@SkitchP wrote:

BigRedLedbetter wrote:

Right. That is a classic logo though from an old time team. Everyone knows that logo. Little old ladies in Flint know that logo. It would look and does look rather stupid if a newer team did it.

This was a disaster.

Ugh, I hated that sleeveless look when it took over the league briefly.

Hey we agreed! Right. Few teams can pull it off. The Pirates and Reds are ok sleeveless. I am struggling to think of anyone else's I liked sleeveless.

BigRedLedbetter · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 10:09 pm

This was one of the worst hats in MLB history. I love all of these colors but we have never had black in our jerseys. Made no sense.

EJ · **Joined:** Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm **Posts:** 7048

Seems that the Rangers have had fail after fail.

BigRedLedbetter · **Posted:** Sat August 29, 2015 10:48 pm

EJ wrote:

Seems that the Rangers have had fail after fail.

At times.

Lament's Uniform Aesthetics Thread...

Who is online