The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
They already have Chubb, I guess they're going wishbone next year.
Yeah I don't get it outside of the Dorsey connection.
It's gotta be a "long con." Hunt can't play until the NFL investigation is complete. That means, given however long that takes and whatever possible suspension comes from it (probably 4 to 8 games), Kareem Hunt either won't play at all in 2019 or he won't play until late in the season.
Either way, he's cheap. If Chubb gets hurt, Hunt's an insurance policy. If Chubb doesn't get hurt, then Hunt gets to split snaps with him and they can sell whichever one they want at far more than they paid for either. Browns get the better of the two backs and get a big payout for whichever they can unload.
Or... nothing comes of Hunt and his career is over and the Browns move on and are out nothing. It's win/win for the Browns.
The x-factor in all of this is Dorsey, who is known for completely fucking up contracts and driving his team into debt. So, I guess, it's just as likely that Dorsey ends up signing both guys to huge deals and the team has no cap flexibility in three years and he gets fired from Cleveland just like he did from KC.
They already have Chubb, I guess they're going wishbone next year.
Yeah I don't get it outside of the Dorsey connection.
It's gotta be a "long con." Hunt can't play until the NFL investigation is complete. That means, given however long that takes and whatever possible suspension comes from it (probably 4 to 8 games), Kareem Hunt either won't play at all in 2019 or he won't play until late in the season.
Either way, he's cheap. If Chubb gets hurt, Hunt's an insurance policy. If Chubb doesn't get hurt, then Hunt gets to split snaps with him and they can sell whichever one they want at far more than they paid for either. Browns get the better of the two backs and get a big payout for whichever they can unload.
Or... nothing comes of Hunt and his career is over and the Browns move on and are out nothing. It's win/win for the Browns.
The x-factor in all of this is Dorsey, who is known for completely fucking up contracts and driving his team into debt. So, I guess, it's just as likely that Dorsey ends up signing both guys to huge deals and the team has no cap flexibility in three years and he gets fired from Cleveland just like he did from KC.
Duke Johnson should definitely take John Dorsey off the Christmas Card list.
They already have Chubb, I guess they're going wishbone next year.
Yeah I don't get it outside of the Dorsey connection.
It's gotta be a "long con." Hunt can't play until the NFL investigation is complete. That means, given however long that takes and whatever possible suspension comes from it (probably 4 to 8 games), Kareem Hunt either won't play at all in 2019 or he won't play until late in the season.
Either way, he's cheap. If Chubb gets hurt, Hunt's an insurance policy. If Chubb doesn't get hurt, then Hunt gets to split snaps with him and they can sell whichever one they want at far more than they paid for either. Browns get the better of the two backs and get a big payout for whichever they can unload.
Or... nothing comes of Hunt and his career is over and the Browns move on and are out nothing. It's win/win for the Browns.
The x-factor in all of this is Dorsey, who is known for completely fucking up contracts and driving his team into debt. So, I guess, it's just as likely that Dorsey ends up signing both guys to huge deals and the team has no cap flexibility in three years and he gets fired from Cleveland just like he did from KC.
Duke Johnson should definitely take John Dorsey off the Christmas Card list.
Duke Johnson is welcome in KC. His skill set with Reid's schemes and Mahomes' ability would be fucking awesome to watch.
The NFL is leaning toward having the Bears host the Packers for next season’s opening kickoff game on Thursday, Sept. 5, according to multiple sources. The move would mark the first time since 2006 that the Super Bowl champion will not appear in the league’s opening game. The newly crowned Patriots likely will host the season’s first “Sunday Night Football” game instead, on Sept. 8.
The NFL is leaning toward having Chicago host the season’s first game as part of its 100th season celebration, allowing it to showcase the league’s oldest rivalry. …
The Ravens are the only other Super Bowl champion since 2006 that did not host the league’s opening game the following season. In 2013, the NFL had Baltimore open the season in Denver because of a scheduling conflict with the neighboring Orioles, who also were playing that night.
Joined: Mon March 18, 2013 11:48 pm Posts: 5223 Location: A Dark Place
Despite the fact that Rosen clearly can't be objectively evaluated because of a shit offensive line, shitty coaching and playcalling... I'm not sure they'll be able to pass up the excitement generated by drafting Kyler Murray.
The NFL is leaning toward having the Bears host the Packers for next season’s opening kickoff game on Thursday, Sept. 5, according to multiple sources. The move would mark the first time since 2006 that the Super Bowl champion will not appear in the league’s opening game. The newly crowned Patriots likely will host the season’s first “Sunday Night Football” game instead, on Sept. 8.
The NFL is leaning toward having Chicago host the season’s first game as part of its 100th season celebration, allowing it to showcase the league’s oldest rivalry. …
The Ravens are the only other Super Bowl champion since 2006 that did not host the league’s opening game the following season. In 2013, the NFL had Baltimore open the season in Denver because of a scheduling conflict with the neighboring Orioles, who also were playing that night.
The NFL is leaning toward having the Bears host the Packers for next season’s opening kickoff game on Thursday, Sept. 5, according to multiple sources. The move would mark the first time since 2006 that the Super Bowl champion will not appear in the league’s opening game. The newly crowned Patriots likely will host the season’s first “Sunday Night Football” game instead, on Sept. 8.
The NFL is leaning toward having Chicago host the season’s first game as part of its 100th season celebration, allowing it to showcase the league’s oldest rivalry. …
The Ravens are the only other Super Bowl champion since 2006 that did not host the league’s opening game the following season. In 2013, the NFL had Baltimore open the season in Denver because of a scheduling conflict with the neighboring Orioles, who also were playing that night.
Good, I hate the night games.
But the rumor is that they'll give NE the Sunday Night game. I'm with ya though. Let us open at 1 pm on a Sunday and raise the banner then, whatevs Goodell
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
