Red Mosquito
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/

Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=7376		 Page 174 of 195
Author:  wease [ Mon June 18, 2018 12:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
B wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Was Chewie subtitled in TFA or TLJ Jorge?

I know Mayhew and the new guy actually are given dialogue and say it on set it’s in the script but they just dub chewie noises over it. Never heard any outside of ‘that old mans crazy’ in a new hope


I'm almost certain I've never seen subtitles for Chewie, R2, or BB-8 prior to Solo.

I’m not almost certain, I’m 100% positive I’ve never seen them.
Author:  bune [ Mon June 18, 2018 1:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Guys. Come on.
Author:  wease [ Mon June 18, 2018 1:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Greedo and Jabba are the only two I can think of. Maybe Bib Fortuna.
Author:  @SkitchP [ Mon June 18, 2018 6:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
I saw this again and liked it marginally better than the first time.
Author:  epilogue [ Mon June 18, 2018 6:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
I watched it again the other day, too. Still a fun movie. It's the least interesting of the Disney films, to be sure.
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Mon June 18, 2018 9:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.
Author:  wease [ Mon June 18, 2018 9:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
dimejinky99 wrote:
Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.

Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Mon June 18, 2018 9:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.

Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?



We both know the answer. Let’s not though.
Author:  @SkitchP [ Tue June 19, 2018 12:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.

Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?



We both know the answer. Let’s not though.



Translation: I can't think of one.
Author:  LoathedVermin72 [ Tue June 19, 2018 12:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
TFA
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Tue June 19, 2018 12:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
@SkitchP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.

Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?



We both know the answer. Let’s not though.



Translation: I can't think of one.



Rogue one. It’s not interesting at all. We know directly what the scenario is and has come from via Rebels/Catalyst and we know exactly what happens the next moment it finishes.
The ring of Caffrene was the only interesting thing in the film.

I’d watch a movie about even younger Han on the streets and how did that happen. What about Beckett and Vals story? Or Landos?

Or Enfys fuckin nest?? How did Dragon boobies end up being Vos’ lieutenant? What’s gonna happen with maul?? What are han and chewie gonna do next?

All far more intriguing and interesting. Rogue one has leads in and one lead out yet is somehow airtight and impervious to any questions like those raised in Solo.

(Saying that, I know a lot of this stuff will be answered an expanded across comics and books etc if it hasn’t started already)
Author:  LoathedVermin72 [ Tue June 19, 2018 12:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Yes because the only thing that makes a movie is interesting is story details
Author:  E.H. Ruddock [ Tue June 19, 2018 12:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
Of course he was talking about Rogue One. You know, the only good SW movie of the new bunch.
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Tue June 19, 2018 1:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
Yes because the only thing that makes a movie is interesting is story details



Helps if the characters are well developed and interesting too and given time to have a story and empathise or even root for them and oh well.
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Tue June 19, 2018 1:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
LV rank the Disney Star Wars films in order of your choice

I’ll wait
Author:  LoathedVermin72 [ Tue June 19, 2018 1:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
1. Rogue One


































2. The Last Jedi
3. Solo














































4. The Force Awakens
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Tue June 19, 2018 1:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
That was unexpected. Cool list. Are all the gaps for the raft of new films were about to get? Good idea.
Author:  wease [ Tue June 19, 2018 2:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
@SkitchP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.

Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?



We both know the answer. Let’s not though.



Translation: I can't think of one.

Me, neither.
Author:  wease [ Tue June 19, 2018 2:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
dimejinky99 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.

Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?



We both know the answer. Let’s not though.



Translation: I can't think of one.



Rogue one. It’s not interesting at all. We know directly what the scenario is and has come from via Rebels/Catalyst and we know exactly what happens the next moment it finishes.
The ring of Caffrene was the only interesting thing in the film.

I’d watch a movie about even younger Han on the streets and how did that happen. What about Beckett and Vals story? Or Landos?

Or Enfys fuckin nest?? How did Dragon boobies end up being Vos’ lieutenant? What’s gonna happen with maul?? What are han and chewie gonna do next?

All far more intriguing and interesting. Rogue one has leads in and one lead out yet is somehow airtight and impervious to any questions like those raised in Solo.

(Saying that, I know a lot of this stuff will be answered an expanded across comics and books etc if it hasn’t started already)

You’re saying Solo is interesting based on stuff that isn’t even in the movie. You’re listing things and directions that may never occur and saying that makes Solo interesting. It’s like saying IG-88 possibly meeting Captain Kirk makes ESB an interesting movie.
Author:  dimejinky99 [ Tue June 19, 2018 6:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
wease wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
Dunno about that. It’s very tantalising what may come out of it. I don’t Think this wanted to be interesting. This needed to be no brainer easy digestible fun. It’s that and more.

Which Disney SW movie is LESS interesting than Solo?



We both know the answer. Let’s not though.



Translation: I can't think of one.



Rogue one. It’s not interesting at all. We know directly what the scenario is and has come from via Rebels/Catalyst and we know exactly what happens the next moment it finishes.
The ring of Caffrene was the only interesting thing in the film.

I’d watch a movie about even younger Han on the streets and how did that happen. What about Beckett and Vals story? Or Landos?

Or Enfys fuckin nest?? How did Dragon boobies end up being Vos’ lieutenant? What’s gonna happen with maul?? What are han and chewie gonna do next?

All far more intriguing and interesting. Rogue one has leads in and one lead out yet is somehow airtight and impervious to any questions like those raised in Solo.

(Saying that, I know a lot of this stuff will be answered an expanded across comics and books etc if it hasn’t started already)

You’re saying Solo is interesting based on stuff that isn’t even in the movie. You’re listing things and directions that may never occur and saying that makes Solo interesting. It’s like saying IG-88 possibly meeting Captain Kirk makes ESB an interesting movie.



Mileage may vary on what constitutes interesting in this context. Solo is a gold mine of what ifs and questions and possibilities. That’s the life blood of most Star Wars fans. Speculation etc. It’s none of those things to other people maybe not as wrapped up in it. That’s fine I get that.
Ps I love rogue one I was just seeing if it’s still easy to set the lads off :)
It was as easy as ever:)
Page 174 of 195 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/