The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm Posts: 31614 Location: Garbage Dump
Mecca wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
Strat wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
The fact that you guys find it so hard to believe that Han could actually, genuinely be happily in love and not want to keep smuggling for criminals probably exposes the fundamental clash in how we're viewing this.
Nah. We do believe he could be. We do believe he was. And we do believe, and find it totally plausible and okay that things changed.
But why is that interesting to you? How is the way it was handled interesting to you? You are simply told all of this in a few lines of dialogue (because Abrams is a hack). Anything could be interesting I suppose, but this isn't. And its pretty obvious that this bare bones backstory only exists to reset the the world to pre-Jedi, so fanboys can rehash the same shit over again.
Plausibility is not the issue here. Get past that.
who said it was interesting? We accept it because it is plausible and that's all that is really needed.
I accept that LV doesn't like it because it undermines subtext of a previous arc.
I accept that burt doesn't like JJ Abrams and that it isn't interesting to him.
I'd be willing to bet that the rest of us accept that part of his story because it makes sense. It doesn't mean we like it, but we are okay with it because it seems organic to the character.
It doesn't mean that any of us disagree with each other. I'm not sure what either of you need besides "I agree with you that this thing that bothers you has validity"
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 47182 Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
You're all batty. The OT was a blast because of the FX and basic plot points. I don't believe that any one of you were sussing out deeper character arc stuff when you were kids, and you mostly liked the light sabers, the costume design, and the action figure tie-ins.
We all hated the prequels because we were old enough to appreciate the finer points, and saw that it was completely lacking in them. But a ton of little kids loved those movies.
Why even desire anything different from the Disney versions? The lazers go PEW!, the sabers go VOOM!, and we even got another trench run. $10 and an evening well spent, no more, no less.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 06, 2016 9:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I accept that LV doesn't like it because it undermines subtext of a previous arc.
I accept that burt doesn't like JJ Abrams and that it isn't interesting to him.
I'd be willing to bet that the rest of us accept that part of his story because it makes sense. It doesn't mean we like it, but we are okay with it because it seems organic to the character.
It doesn't mean that any of us disagree with each other. I'm not sure what either of you need besides "I agree with you that this thing that bothers you has validity"
Ive learned in my dating life that often times the other person just wants to know their feelings are valid.
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 47182 Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
Strat wrote:
Mecca wrote:
I accept that LV doesn't like it because it undermines subtext of a previous arc.
I accept that burt doesn't like JJ Abrams and that it isn't interesting to him.
I'd be willing to bet that the rest of us accept that part of his story because it makes sense. It doesn't mean we like it, but we are okay with it because it seems organic to the character.
It doesn't mean that any of us disagree with each other. I'm not sure what either of you need besides "I agree with you that this thing that bothers you has validity"
Ive learned in my dating life that often times the other person just wants to know their feelings are valid.
A wise person once told me that the two primary desires of all humans are to be recognized, and to feel included.
I accept that LV doesn't like it because it undermines subtext of a previous arc.
I accept that burt doesn't like JJ Abrams and that it isn't interesting to him.
I'd be willing to bet that the rest of us accept that part of his story because it makes sense. It doesn't mean we like it, but we are okay with it because it seems organic to the character.
It doesn't mean that any of us disagree with each other. I'm not sure what either of you need besides "I agree with you that this thing that bothers you has validity"
Ive learned in my dating life that often times the other person just wants to know their feelings are valid.
A wise person once told me that the two primary desires of all humans are to be recognized, and to feel included.
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 47182 Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
Strat wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:
Mecca wrote:
I accept that LV doesn't like it because it undermines subtext of a previous arc.
I accept that burt doesn't like JJ Abrams and that it isn't interesting to him.
I'd be willing to bet that the rest of us accept that part of his story because it makes sense. It doesn't mean we like it, but we are okay with it because it seems organic to the character.
It doesn't mean that any of us disagree with each other. I'm not sure what either of you need besides "I agree with you that this thing that bothers you has validity"
Ive learned in my dating life that often times the other person just wants to know their feelings are valid.
A wise person once told me that the two primary desires of all humans are to be recognized, and to feel included.
And thats why im single. Fuck that shit
Because you don't care to recognize and include another person? Or because they can't do that for you?
I accept that LV doesn't like it because it undermines subtext of a previous arc.
I accept that burt doesn't like JJ Abrams and that it isn't interesting to him.
I'd be willing to bet that the rest of us accept that part of his story because it makes sense. It doesn't mean we like it, but we are okay with it because it seems organic to the character.
It doesn't mean that any of us disagree with each other. I'm not sure what either of you need besides "I agree with you that this thing that bothers you has validity"
Ive learned in my dating life that often times the other person just wants to know their feelings are valid.
A wise person once told me that the two primary desires of all humans are to be recognized, and to feel included.
And thats why im single. Fuck that shit
Because you don't care to recognize and include another person? Or because they can't do that for you?
Because if Han and Leia can't make it work, what chance do i have?
I accept that LV doesn't like it because it undermines subtext of a previous arc.
I accept that burt doesn't like JJ Abrams and that it isn't interesting to him.
I'd be willing to bet that the rest of us accept that part of his story because it makes sense. It doesn't mean we like it, but we are okay with it because it seems organic to the character.
It doesn't mean that any of us disagree with each other. I'm not sure what either of you need besides "I agree with you that this thing that bothers you has validity"
Ive learned in my dating life that often times the other person just wants to know their feelings are valid.
A wise person once told me that the two primary desires of all humans are to be recognized, and to feel included.
And thats why im single. Fuck that shit
Because you don't care to recognize and include another person? Or because they can't do that for you?
Because if Han and Leia can't make it work, what chance do i have?
I've heard you have a big dong. What else do you need?
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm Posts: 31614 Location: Garbage Dump
tragabigzanda wrote:
You're all batty. The OT was a blast because of the FX and basic plot points. I don't believe that any one of you were sussing out deeper character arc stuff when you were kids, and you mostly liked the light sabers, the costume design, and the action figure tie-ins.
We all hated the prequels because we were old enough to appreciate the finer points, and saw that it was completely lacking in them. But a ton of little kids loved those movies.
Why even desire anything different from the Disney versions? The lazers go PEW!, the sabers go VOOM!, and we even got another trench run. $10 and an evening well spent, no more, no less.
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm Posts: 47182 Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
Strat wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:
Mecca wrote:
I accept that LV doesn't like it because it undermines subtext of a previous arc.
I accept that burt doesn't like JJ Abrams and that it isn't interesting to him.
I'd be willing to bet that the rest of us accept that part of his story because it makes sense. It doesn't mean we like it, but we are okay with it because it seems organic to the character.
It doesn't mean that any of us disagree with each other. I'm not sure what either of you need besides "I agree with you that this thing that bothers you has validity"
Ive learned in my dating life that often times the other person just wants to know their feelings are valid.
A wise person once told me that the two primary desires of all humans are to be recognized, and to feel included.
And thats why im single. Fuck that shit
Because you don't care to recognize and include another person? Or because they can't do that for you?
Because if Han and Leia can't make it work, what chance do i have?
They were going to make it work, until Adam Driver stabbed Han in the stomach. If there's any lesson here Strat, it's don't ignore a moody Adam Driver.
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm Posts: 39834 Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Mecca wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:
Strat wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
The fact that you guys find it so hard to believe that Han could actually, genuinely be happily in love and not want to keep smuggling for criminals probably exposes the fundamental clash in how we're viewing this.
Nah. We do believe he could be. We do believe he was. And we do believe, and find it totally plausible and okay that things changed.
But why is that interesting to you? How is the way it was handled interesting to you? You are simply told all of this in a few lines of dialogue (because Abrams is a hack). Anything could be interesting I suppose, but this isn't. And its pretty obvious that this bare bones backstory only exists to reset the the world to pre-Jedi, so fanboys can rehash the same shit over again.
Plausibility is not the issue here. Get past that.
who said it was interesting? We accept it because it is plausible and that's all that is really needed.
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm Posts: 39953
So here's a long post I was writing as the conversation moved on. Here is Han's arc, as I see it.
When we meet Han Solo in a New Hope he is a hunted, haunted man. He can clearly create attachments because he loves and cares for Chewie despite bossing him around, but he is highly reluctant to let anyone in. He is suspicious and cynical and guarded. It’s not that he only cares about himself—it’s that he’s afraid of caring about other people. Over the course of the trilogy his arc is finding a way to let other people in and take risks on behalf of othem. He doesn’t need to be taught that it’s the right thing to do. He clearly knows that it is. He needs to be taught that other people are worth sacrificing for. He agrees to rescue the princess (I don’t buy that he only does this for money) in a New Hope and comes back for Luke (probably his plan) but he hides what he’s doing because he is afraid of letting his guard down. These are baby steps—they culminate in him accepting a role in the rebellion (a general), and allowing himself new attachments – to Luke and to Leia in different ways. Learning that there are people and causes and ideas worth fighting for.
Fast forward to The Force Awakens. I agree with strat that while he is in the movie partly for nostalgia he is also there to help legitimate the new characters in the eyes of the audience—to pass the torch. Maybe you don’t like that personally, but chalk that up to your taste not aligning with the rest of the galaxy.
The question is can they do that in a way that is not only faithful to the character, but develops the character further in the process. And I think they unquestionably succeed.
We all seem to agree that his leaving Leia over the stress of his kid ‘s turn to the dark side was a plausible story reason to separate them. Having him make a living smuggling also seems realistic—and his arc is not his profession. If we’re uprooted and unsettled of course we fall back on old habits.
But look at what happens to him throughout the movie. He is disappointed in the universe (understandable) but he’s not cynical about it (and as people have remarked his ‘it’s true’ speech about the Force happens in the same spot where he was once dismissive about it). He is clearly willing to risk his life for the Resistance. He is willing to help Rey and Finn, despite having no personal connection to them. Han doesn’t really take a journey in the Force Awakens—they reset the plot but not the character.
And in the end Han ends up sacrificing himself for someone that he loves, with no guarantee of success and a high probability of failure. He has completed the journey that began in a New Hope. It is the perfect closure to his arc—much more than settling down with Leia for the happy ending.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum