The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
This is going to be a weird boot to listen to with all the guests who were allowed to take the mic, from Tom Hamilton to Youk to Dick the doorman. I wonder if anything will be edited out (all the stuff about Polaroids was also very visual).
I just heard part of night 1 on Sirius, including the polaroid story, and it was weird not having the visual.
Was this a plug for Mike's new book?
_________________
emanon wrote:
I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
This is going to be a weird boot to listen to with all the guests who were allowed to take the mic, from Tom Hamilton to Youk to Dick the doorman. I wonder if anything will be edited out (all the stuff about Polaroids was also very visual).
I just heard part of night 1 on Sirius, including the polaroid story, and it was weird not having the visual.
Was this a plug for Mike's new book?
I just heard that part of the show on my drive home. Ed is pretty good at nailing the point home and/or punchline. It came across just fine. However, i enjoy ed's ramblings.
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 2:14 am
I Have A Third Nipple
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am Posts: 19722 Location: Cumberland, RI
This goes for both shows: this was the first time ever that I've actually been genuinely annoyed by cell phones at a concert. Most of the time, I see people whip out a phone once or twice for a photo--I do it too, no big deal, you're got a nice new background maybe. Cool. But there were people around me both nights who recorded 10-second clips of each and every song. It was worse on Friday when I could barely see the stage through the phones, but it was definitely present both nights.
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 2:22 am
Poster of the Year
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Simple Torture wrote:
This goes for both shows: this was the first time ever that I've actually been genuinely annoyed by cell phones at a concert. Most of the time, I see people whip out a phone once or twice for a photo--I do it too, no big deal, you're got a nice new background maybe. Cool. But there were people around me both nights who recorded 10-second clips of each and every song. It was worse on Friday when I could barely see the stage through the phones, but it was definitely present both nights.
This goes for both shows: this was the first time ever that I've actually been genuinely annoyed by cell phones at a concert. Most of the time, I see people whip out a phone once or twice for a photo--I do it too, no big deal, you're got a nice new background maybe. Cool. But there were people around me both nights who recorded 10-second clips of each and every song. It was worse on Friday when I could barely see the stage through the phones, but it was definitely present both nights.
lady in front of me was doing this friday
I want to link to a thread where we argued about this. but its a waste of time and i can't remember what thread it was in. and you didnt really say anything negative about the above thing so ill just let it be.
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 2:31 am
I Have A Third Nipple
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am Posts: 19722 Location: Cumberland, RI
I saw a couple of people get shamed on the video board kast night; i.e., the camera focused on their part of the crowd while they were texting, and they had to swiftly put their phone away as not to look lame.
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 2:47 am
Poster of the Year
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm Posts: 37156 Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Strat wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
This goes for both shows: this was the first time ever that I've actually been genuinely annoyed by cell phones at a concert. Most of the time, I see people whip out a phone once or twice for a photo--I do it too, no big deal, you're got a nice new background maybe. Cool. But there were people around me both nights who recorded 10-second clips of each and every song. It was worse on Friday when I could barely see the stage through the phones, but it was definitely present both nights.
lady in front of me was doing this friday
I want to link to a thread where we argued about this. but its a waste of time and i can't remember what thread it was in. and you didnt really say anything negative about the above thing so ill just let it be.
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 9:42 am
Looks Like a Cat
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm Posts: 14251
spike wrote:
the wrigley shows will put the fenway shows to shame
I hope so
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Tue August 09, 2016 5:55 pm
Future Drummer
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm Posts: 3031 Location: Louisville, KY
Birds in Hell wrote:
hlniv wrote:
So, why trot this song out now and not any time in the last 22 years? Obviously because of Dave A, but they had to have worked out some deal with him, right? He's got a personal songwriting credit for it, correct? This is already been played on Sirius a shitload of times and they're going to release it with the official bootlegs.
I doubt they had to work anything out with him, he has a songwriting credit for every song on Vs and most on Vitalogy. Angel's no different.
Pretty sure that both Vs. and Vitalogy were actually credited to the band as a group, not the individuals. That would be the difference. Go was "Dave's Song", but Pearl Jam (or all five individuals collectively) is the composer.
Angel had a songwriting credit individually to Dave A.
I'm no expert on this, but doesn't that make a difference? Maybe it doesn't even matter for live performances anyway...
Just seems odd to bring this back now after so long, and mention Dave the way he did in Telluride.
So, why trot this song out now and not any time in the last 22 years? Obviously because of Dave A, but they had to have worked out some deal with him, right? He's got a personal songwriting credit for it, correct? This is already been played on Sirius a shitload of times and they're going to release it with the official bootlegs.
I doubt they had to work anything out with him, he has a songwriting credit for every song on Vs and most on Vitalogy. Angel's no different.
Pretty sure that both Vs. and Vitalogy were actually credited to the band as a group, not the individuals. That would be the difference. Go was "Dave's Song", but Pearl Jam (or all five individuals collectively) is the composer.
Angel had a songwriting credit individually to Dave A.
I'm no expert on this, but doesn't that make a difference? Maybe it doesn't even matter for live performances anyway...
Just seems odd to bring this back now after so long, and mention Dave the way he did in Telluride.
Vs. songs received individual credits with one the reissue or rereleases.
_________________
emanon wrote:
I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Wed August 10, 2016 12:29 am
Looks Like a Cat
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm Posts: 14251
One thing I noticed about the crowd at this one, why were so many dudes dressed like they just left the regatta club? Vineyard Vines? I get the EvenBro thing. Lots of desperate ladies at these shows. But why the fuck are you shopping at the same store that Land Rover owning stay at home moms go to? Was Gap too radical?
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Wed August 10, 2016 12:35 am
I Have A Third Nipple
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am Posts: 19722 Location: Cumberland, RI
Bi_3 wrote:
One thing I noticed about the crowd at this one, why were so many dudes dressed like they just left the regatta club? Vineyard Vines? I get the EvenBro thing. Lots of desperate ladies at these shows. But why the fuck are you shopping at the same store that Land Rover owning stay at home moms go to? Was Gap too radical?
My entire section was beer bellies in t-shirts, so I guess I lucked out?
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Wed August 10, 2016 1:18 am
Looks Like a Cat
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm Posts: 14251
numbers wrote:
Id like to see a decent video of DTE from this show, there doesn't seem to be one yet. I felt like that was one of the highlights of the show.
Yup. The entire second encore was fantastic, a rarity in modern PJ and one the reasons I came away loving this show.
_________________ "The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
Post subject: Re: 2016-08-07: Boston, Massachusetts
Posted: Wed August 10, 2016 1:21 am
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am Posts: 22365
Dave A returning to PJ fulltime in order to free Matt to return to SG fulltime will never happen. I have accepted that at this point. but I don't want to. Kind of like transgender bathroom rights.
We should be having the GTFO conversation about this Boston show. Not the GOAT conversation. Or maybe the G2H conversation.
And preppies dressing like preppies in Boston should be no surprise. It's one of the main sources of their not-so-subtle aryan power.
The greatest part of this show is that it is over. And it will be on to PJ at Wrigley, and a PJ BJ for a new USA city.
Boston loves Boston more than Boston loves Boston.
Now it is over.
So GFY.
Go Yankees
_________________ All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum