Yes, a huge fan. So big a fan that I wore long johns under my shorts during August in Phoenix.
1994 to 2000
| Red Mosquito http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/ |
|
| Era of the moment: 1991-1992 http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=981 |
Page 1 of 5 |
| Author: | nightmareblack0206 [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
I feel there should be a thread for this. The guys were never as good when they were young, broke but up and coming. I'm off today having few beers listening to them during these times. HOLY FUCK THEY WERE ELECTRIC....WTF HAPPENED TO EDDIES VOICE. ..... |
|
| Author: | EJ [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
what kind of beer are you drinking? |
|
| Author: | Norris [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
meh on this era |
|
| Author: | nightmareblack0206 [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
Any old time fans out there? Do you remember when Eddie was somewhat a man of mystery and intrigue?I reremember. Days before web |
|
| Author: | nightmareblack0206 [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
EJ wrote: what kind of beer are you drinking? I have 4 budweiser tall boys from last weekend. HITTING THE SPOT |
|
| Author: | Norris [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
they got even better just a few years later |
|
| Author: | nightmareblack0206 [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
cutuphalfdead wrote: meh on this era You serious? Come on now |
|
| Author: | nyquillyn [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
I'll be 40 soon, does that make me an old-time fan? I'm also meh on this era. |
|
| Author: | nightmareblack0206 [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated |
|
| Author: | nightmareblack0206 [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
turned2black wrote: I'll be 40 soon, does that make me an old-time fan? I'm also meh on this era. Where you a fan then? If not you opinion is moot |
|
| Author: | Norris [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
nightmareblack0206 wrote: No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated eddies voice peaked around 98 |
|
| Author: | nyquillyn [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
Yes, a huge fan. So big a fan that I wore long johns under my shorts during August in Phoenix. 1994 to 2000
|
|
| Author: | nightmareblack0206 [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
cutuphalfdead wrote: nightmareblack0206 wrote: No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated eddies voice peaked around 98 That's when he learned to sing due to the fact that he had to be how badly he destroyed his chords. IMO his voice peaked on Vitalogy. NOTHINGMAN was phenomenal. His highs were there. ..his growl...his scream....ALL PERFECT BLEND |
|
| Author: | Norris [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
nightmareblack0206 wrote: cutuphalfdead wrote: nightmareblack0206 wrote: No they didn't. Eddies voice has been a straight decline since 1992. Band sound got tighter BUT vedder voice deteriorated eddies voice peaked around 98 That's when he learned to sing due to the fact that he had to be how badly he destroyed his chords. IMO his voice peaked on Vitalogy. NOTHINGMAN was phenomenal. His highs were there. ..his growl...his scream....ALL PERFECT BLEND well which is it, was it in steady decline since 92 or did it peak in 94 ? |
|
| Author: | EJ [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
They were certainly exciting in those very early years. And, yes, Ed's soaring vocals and his mystique was a huge part of the appeal. The "Animal/RIFW" performance on the 93 MTV Video Awards was one of the most goosebump raising things they'd to that point. It was raw, powerful, and separated them from the pack. But, if I had to choose the best period of the band, it'd be 1994-2000 - a much more creative band and Ed's talents as an all-around singer improved dramatically. |
|
| Author: | nightmareblack0206 [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
Show me one show better than their unplugged in 1992. That was in queens. I was living in Brooklyn at that time |
|
| Author: | Dr. Van Nostrand [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
cutuphalfdead wrote: meh on this era only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though. |
|
| Author: | Norris [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote: cutuphalfdead wrote: meh on this era only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though. maybe but I'm not saying pearl jam didn't get good until no code or something ten era pearl jam was great but they got so much better just 2 years later |
|
| Author: | nightmareblack0206 [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote: cutuphalfdead wrote: meh on this era only to the ones that didnt grow up with them from the beginning i think, could be wrong though. DING-DING. ...WE HAVE A WINNER |
|
| Author: | Strat [ Mon March 11, 2013 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Era of the moment: 1991-1992 |
It is pretty remarkable to think of their growth within such a short period of time. This period is pretty incredible but looking back knowing what better came - its not my favorite. Certainly being a fan during the time was pretty incredible but 95-2000 pearl jam was phenomenal. |
|
| Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|