The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Watched from the Window ... » Pearl Jam




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Sat June 24, 2017 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Posts: 9161
Location: unnamed mental hospital
McParadigm wrote:
stip wrote:
The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know :)


I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place

"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.

There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.

I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.

_________________
Strat wrote:
Alas, we are RM


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Sat June 24, 2017 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Posts: 21812
evenslow wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
stip wrote:
The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know :)


I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place

"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.

There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.

I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.

Agreed. It's hard to tell from the way they talked about it at the time whether or not they actually recognized what a risk that record was, though.

_________________
(patriotic choking noises)


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Sat June 24, 2017 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
F.U.B.A.R
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Posts: 9061
Location: Lft Craquepeau
McParadigm wrote:
evenslow wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
stip wrote:
The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know :)


I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place

"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.

There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.

I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.

Agreed. It's hard to tell from the way they talked about it at the time whether or not they actually recognized what a risk that record was, though.

So it begs the question, do we want a safe record this time or do we want PJ to take some risks?

_________________
Rangi Guy wrote:
So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Sat June 24, 2017 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Major Dude
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 32433
Location: Where everybody knows your name
Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
evenslow wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
stip wrote:
The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know :)


I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place

"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.

There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.

I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.

Agreed. It's hard to tell from the way they talked about it at the time whether or not they actually recognized what a risk that record was, though.

So it begs the question, do we want a safe record this time or do we want PJ to take some risks?

Risks all the way. They should get all the tunes Matt wrote for the Soundgarden album and record them. (Assuming they weren't finished and SG doesn't plan on releasing it).

_________________
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Sun June 25, 2017 1:39 am 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Posts: 9161
Location: unnamed mental hospital
I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.

_________________
Strat wrote:
Alas, we are RM


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Sun June 25, 2017 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Posts: 21812
evenslow wrote:
I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.

100%

_________________
(patriotic choking noises)


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Sun June 25, 2017 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Major Dude
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 32433
Location: Where everybody knows your name
McParadigm wrote:
evenslow wrote:
I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.

100%

Yes, indeed

_________________
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Sun June 25, 2017 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm
Posts: 1843
Lounge Lizard wrote:
Angry punkish numbers; kickass riffs by Stone; hallucinogenic interludes and a completely nut-loose closer; a moody half ballad discussing the cost of endless life


I think PJ has tried this formula on pretty much every album. It's just that the songs aren't as good.

_________________
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Sun June 25, 2017 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar
10Club Complaint Department
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Posts: 15145
Location: Gigatown
wease wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
evenslow wrote:
I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.

100%

Yes, indeed

We've all said this a thousand times. :gomez:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Mon June 26, 2017 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am
Posts: 2870
evenslow wrote:
I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
What is a failed experiment at this point? I'd call the last two albums failed experiments.

For all the talk of Vitalogy being a risk, I don't see that. They put a sure fire hit on it in Betterman and they had to know Immortality was going to go over well. The musical songs are all pretty straight forward and a continuation of Vs, same for the lyrics. Then there's the filler. Is it risky putting filler on an album where you have to feel you have two big hits?

When I see people wanting a Vitalogy 2.0 is what they really want something more raw and less polished in the production? With one or two far fetched ideas included even though the average person will just skip them?

_________________
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Mon June 26, 2017 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 32244
Location: Buenos Aires
I like Vitalogy's musical songs

_________________
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
Hehe


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Mon June 26, 2017 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Posts: 9161
Location: unnamed mental hospital
surfndestroy wrote:
evenslow wrote:
I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
What is a failed experiment at this point?

It would be more akin to Binaural than Vitalogy probably. Just them stepping outside their mainstream-ish comfort zone to make space for the slightly artier material like "Nothing As It Seems" or "Sleight of Hand." Even something like "Of The Earth" I would be happy about b/c you can hear them trying for something bigger on it. A little ambition goes a long way.

Barring that, I think most people around here would just be happy with some production that doesn't sound like it was created in BOB's radio-rock lab.

_________________
Strat wrote:
Alas, we are RM


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Mon June 26, 2017 7:29 pm 
Online
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Posts: 34077
Location: Mountains
evenslow wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:
evenslow wrote:
I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
What is a failed experiment at this point?

It would be more akin to Binaural than Vitalogy probably. Just them stepping outside their mainstream-ish comfort zone to make space for the slightly artier material like "Nothing As It Seems" or "Sleight of Hand." Even something like "Of The Earth" I would be happy about b/c you can hear them trying for something bigger on it. A little ambition goes a long way.

Barring that, I think most people around here would just be happy with some production that doesn't sound like it was created in BOB's radio-rock lab.

That and i hope for the non 2-3 punk numbers 1 big anthem, 1-3 semi anthems, and 2 ed solo track thing.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Mon June 26, 2017 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar
F.U.B.A.R
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Posts: 9061
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Maybe they should make the next Tool album. That'd be a risk.

_________________
Rangi Guy wrote:
So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Vitalogy 2.0
PostPosted: Mon June 26, 2017 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Stone's Bitch
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Posts: 9161
Location: unnamed mental hospital
Strat wrote:
evenslow wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:
evenslow wrote:
I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
What is a failed experiment at this point?

It would be more akin to Binaural than Vitalogy probably. Just them stepping outside their mainstream-ish comfort zone to make space for the slightly artier material like "Nothing As It Seems" or "Sleight of Hand." Even something like "Of The Earth" I would be happy about b/c you can hear them trying for something bigger on it. A little ambition goes a long way.

Barring that, I think most people around here would just be happy with some production that doesn't sound like it was created in BOB's radio-rock lab.

That and i hope for the non 2-3 punk numbers 1 big anthem, 1-3 semi anthems, and 2 ed solo track thing.

AKA paint-by-numbers AKA the Lightning Bolt treatment.

_________________
Strat wrote:
Alas, we are RM


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » Watched from the Window ... » Pearl Jam


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AndySlash, Antelope, Arthur Morgan, bluestate, Brett, dad, Fattie_Vedder, FirstMammal, Gigalogy84, Hypnos, ItsOkay, mastaflatch, Monkey_Driven, oneway23, philpritchard, Rangi Guy, Rob, RockPusher, smallest_oceans, stip, Strat, Tj, Vindicator and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Fri April 19, 2024 2:45 am