The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: Re: Song of the Moment: Indifference
Posted: Thu September 28, 2023 1:13 pm
Rank This Poster
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm Posts: 4330
Go grab your CD copy of Yield, skip to the very last track, and “All Those Yesterdays” will start to play. Do that again with Binaural and Ten and you’ll find yourself listening to “Parting Ways” and “Release”, son.
Now go ahead and try that very same thing with Vitalogy and what will you be hearing? “Stupid Mop”, my friend.
You can even do that with your vinyl copy if you prefer. Look for that groove before the last track, then drop, drop, drop that needle down, and sure enough, you’ll be groovin to “Stupid Mop” once again.
Post subject: Re: Song of the Moment: Indifference
Posted: Thu September 28, 2023 3:26 pm
tl;dr
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm Posts: 8568
stip wrote:
youve already had to introduce qualifiers to the simple rule in edge cases:
-the track has to be listed (even if the hidden track is an important part of an album’s ‘story’)
- the track cant be a bonus track (why not? it has a number. it is listed. It is sequentially included on a tracklisting. sometimes it is included from the begining)
-some songs like master/slave we definitely don’t consider part of Release, and yet they are on the same track. So Release closes Ten and not Master/Slave? Why is M/S not part of Release
these are not intended to be gotcha questions. It’s just that the idea of a closer means something different in our shared usage (i think$ as opposed to a last song or last track. A d given the way the overwhelming number of vitalogy listening experiences tend to stop w immortality, the way it can mark the end of a satisfying listening experience, and the extraneous ‘footnot’ nature of stupid mop means that in our practice immortality ends the core vitalogy experience and should be considered a closer in our sacred rankings.
There are a couple of qualifiers, since edge cases do exist, but they are relatively clear guidelines that can be applied objectively and consistently, and are really just my way of attempting to put into words what — I imagine, at least — the majority of listeners naturally intuit. There have been an abundance of discussions on RM over the years about album closers, and 99% of users seem to effortlessly agree on what group of songs that entails. I agree with you that there is some historical basis for believing that many listeners ignore "Stupid Mop," but I think it makes more sense to simply assume that this preference will play out in people's ratings, as opposed to assuming that the preference has somehow willed the song into being something other than what it demonstrably is.
We all joke about ranking things, but I think the reason it has proven such an effective conversation starter over the years is because it's a topic with clearly defined parameters and an extremely low bar for entry in order to participate. To that end, concepts like "the track which completes the album's narrative arc" (which is completely open to interpretation) and "the last track on the album that most listeners consistently listen to" (which is unknowable, and more often than not will likely just be a projection of our own preferences) are too subjective and ephemeral -- interesting discussions to have on their own, perhaps, but unnecessary complications to an otherwise simple, clear-cut concept.
Matters wrote:
I’m not understanding why a track being “hidden” somehow allows it to defy the definitions of last and closer.
Technically it doesn't, I just don't think it's consistent with what the discussion instinctively entails. Having only ever seen people argue for this hypothetically, I think listeners assume some intentionality on the part of the artist when they separate or hide something from the documented tracklisting. Perhaps this is incorrect.
Post subject: Re: Song of the Moment: Indifference
Posted: Thu September 28, 2023 5:15 pm
The worst
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm Posts: 39922
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:
youve already had to introduce qualifiers to the simple rule in edge cases:
-the track has to be listed (even if the hidden track is an important part of an album’s ‘story’)
- the track cant be a bonus track (why not? it has a number. it is listed. It is sequentially included on a tracklisting. sometimes it is included from the begining)
-some songs like master/slave we definitely don’t consider part of Release, and yet they are on the same track. So Release closes Ten and not Master/Slave? Why is M/S not part of Release
these are not intended to be gotcha questions. It’s just that the idea of a closer means something different in our shared usage (i think$ as opposed to a last song or last track. A d given the way the overwhelming number of vitalogy listening experiences tend to stop w immortality, the way it can mark the end of a satisfying listening experience, and the extraneous ‘footnot’ nature of stupid mop means that in our practice immortality ends the core vitalogy experience and should be considered a closer in our sacred rankings.
There are a couple of qualifiers, since edge cases do exist, but they are relatively clear guidelines that can be applied objectively and consistently, and are really just my way of attempting to put into words what — I imagine, at least — the majority of listeners naturally intuit. There have been an abundance of discussions on RM over the years about album closers, and 99% of users seem to effortlessly agree on what group of songs that entails. I agree with you that there is some historical basis for believing that many listeners ignore "Stupid Mop," but I think it makes more sense to simply assume that this preference will play out in people's ratings, as opposed to assuming that the preference has somehow willed the song into being something other than what it demonstrably is.
We all joke about ranking things, but I think the reason it has proven such an effective conversation starter over the years is because it's a topic with clearly defined parameters and an extremely low bar for entry in order to participate. To that end, concepts like "the track which completes the album's narrative arc" (which is completely open to interpretation) and "the last track on the album that most listeners consistently listen to" (which is unknowable, and more often than not will likely just be a projection of our own preferences) are too subjective and ephemeral -- interesting discussions to have on their own, perhaps, but unnecessary complications to an otherwise simple, clear-cut concept.
Matters wrote:
I’m not understanding why a track being “hidden” somehow allows it to defy the definitions of last and closer.
Technically it doesn't, I just don't think it's consistent with what the discussion instinctively entails. Having only ever seen people argue for this hypothetically, I think listeners assume some intentionality on the part of the artist when they separate or hide something from the documented tracklisting. Perhaps this is incorrect.
Post subject: Re: Song of the Moment: Indifference
Posted: Thu September 28, 2023 10:10 pm
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Joined: Tue December 24, 2019 8:48 pm Posts: 935
tragabigzanda wrote:
Fine matters, have it your dumb way.
Indifference All or None Stupid Mop Master/Slave Future Days Around the Bend Hummus Avocado sound effect The End River Cross Binaural Typing
I don’t want it that way. I posted my list of closers and it included Release, Immortality and ATY as it should. My point is that bending the rules and definition of words is widely accepted for some albums but not so much for Vitalogy. I don’t care that Pearl Jam put an extra groove in the CD and vinyl to separate Immortality from Mop, or that they had Stupid Mop typed on the album sleeve. The listening experience of the album isn’t changed by either of those things.
Post subject: Re: Song of the Moment: Indifference
Posted: Thu September 28, 2023 11:31 pm
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Joined: Tue December 24, 2019 8:48 pm Posts: 935
Kevin Davis wrote:
I think listeners assume some intentionality on the part of the artist when they separate or hide something from the documented tracklisting. Perhaps this is incorrect.
I agree most active listeners probably take that into consideration. In general, I admit I usually lean towards “the artist’s intent is irrelevant.” That may seem brash but over time it’s often the reality.
Post subject: Re: Song of the Moment: Indifference
Posted: Fri September 29, 2023 6:11 am
AnalLog
Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am Posts: 1843
guitar_davey wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
Hummus ranked way too low.
Hummus is also not on the vinyl version of of Yield, for what that's worth...
Hummus gave me a bit of scare when I first heard it. Let me share a small personal memory.
I was a college student living in a rented apartment and my roommates were all away for the holidays so I had the whole place to myself. I would frequently play Yield real loud taking advantage of the situation, but I would always press Next on the stereo at the end of All Those Yesterdays because I thought there was some kind of technical error at the end of the CD. I mean, a long weird silence with nothing happening - who has time for that when you can just listen to Brain of J in all its glory AGAIN?
But this one time ATY was on while I was in the shower with the bathroom door open. Then silence. I'm still in the shower, thinking my shower thoughts and doing shower things. Then SUDDENLY there's strange music I had never heard before. I am absolutely certain it's not coming from any of the CDs I own, for sure! First thought is someone broke into the place. There's a burglar in the apartment with me and I'm in the shower naked. The burglar must think no one's home. He likes to steal things while his favorite music is playing, so he pops a CD he brought with him into the stereo. Makes perfect sense to someone scared witless, dressed in foam and armed with a shampoo bottle held like a knife. Oh god
And that's how I found out there's a hidden track at the end of Yield.
Post subject: Re: Song of the Moment: Indifference
Posted: Fri September 29, 2023 7:22 am
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Joined: Tue December 24, 2019 8:48 pm Posts: 935
Farmer John wrote:
Which Beatles song does All Those Yesterdays most closely resemble?
This is a tough question to answer. One of the reasons I admire ATY so much is because it’s always had a Beatles feel but it’s never reminded me of a specific Beatles song.
Probably Carry that Weight
It also has a bit of I’ve Got a Feeling and I Want You with a nice touch of what John referred to as Paul’s “granny shit.”
Post subject: Re: Song of the Moment: Indifference
Posted: Fri September 29, 2023 11:33 am
Major Dude
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm Posts: 32515 Location: Where everybody knows your name
Matters wrote:
Farmer John wrote:
Which Beatles song does All Those Yesterdays most closely resemble?
This is a tough question to answer. One of the reasons I admire ATY so much is because it’s always had a Beatles feel but it’s never reminded me of a specific Beatles song.
Probably Carry that Weight
It also has a bit of I’ve Got a Feeling and I Want You with a nice touch of what John referred to as Paul’s “granny shit.”
You’re one of those that says Given to Fly is nothing like Going to California, aren’t you?
_________________ Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing! - C. Montgomery Burns
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum