General Pearl Jam discussion.
Tue January 29, 2013 4:22 am
anyway, we're getting off track here guys...
NEW PEARL JAM
Tue January 29, 2013 4:24 am
evenslow wrote:stip wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:What myth?
doc was here long enough to remember when everyone hated riot act
bingo. it's one of the thing's tm does best: revisionist history.
just wait a few more years for the next installment when 'actually s/t is underrated.'
It's very underrated
Tue January 29, 2013 4:25 am
evenslow wrote:anyway, we're getting off track here guys...
NEW PEARL JAM
Tue January 29, 2013 4:29 am
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:a date for the new album
Tue January 29, 2013 4:34 am
evenslow wrote:bingo. it's one of the thing's rm does best: revisionist history.
just wait a few more years for the next installment when 'actually s/t is underrated.'
WAIT SO YOU'RE TELLING ME PEOPLE'S OPINION CHANGES OVER TIME?!?
Fuck.
Fuck, man. Fuck. What are we even doing here, then?
Tue January 29, 2013 4:42 am
for as much bitching and complaining we do around here about the band, we all know we got a little excited when we read about this.
Tue January 29, 2013 4:46 am
theplatypus wrote:evenslow wrote:bingo. it's one of the thing's rm does best: revisionist history.
just wait a few more years for the next installment when 'actually s/t is underrated.'
WAIT SO YOU'RE TELLING ME PEOPLE'S OPINION CHANGES OVER TIME?!?
Fuck.
Fuck, man. Fuck. What are we even doing here, then?
There's theplatypus! Good one man.
My opinion that tomorrow is going to be awesome will not change.
Unless they're just announcing new socks.
Tue January 29, 2013 4:52 am
B wrote:verb_to_trust wrote:There is no way they are done with an album.
That doesn't mean there isn't a new song coming out tomorrow.
Ole!
Tue January 29, 2013 4:55 am
bodysnatcher wrote:for as much bitching and complaining we do around here about the band, we all know we got a little excited when we read about this.
Of course. Just a little.
Though there's been little enjoyment drawn for me from the last five years or so of Pearl Jam's career, I'll always hope that they manage to pull things back on track.
Tue January 29, 2013 4:58 am
With Jeff and Matt being really busy the last several months I just don't see how anything big Pearl Jam wise is greased up and ready to go tomorrow. It would be nice if I am wrong about that....
Tue January 29, 2013 4:59 am
It's probably a DVD or box set announcement.
Tue January 29, 2013 5:02 am
Eddie's early 2000s techno album.
Tue January 29, 2013 5:20 am
Zing!
Tue January 29, 2013 5:22 am
verb_to_trust wrote:With Jeff and Matt being really busy the last several months I just don't see how anything big Pearl Jam wise is greased up and ready to go tomorrow. It would be nice if I am wrong about that....
In the very least there is a 3 month lag from when an album is finished being recorded till when it's released. Plenty of time to squeeze in non-PJ things after completing those guys parts.
Tue January 29, 2013 9:36 am
Great news and great to be back on RM after the re-load.
Tue January 29, 2013 11:19 am
Apparently they've been sitting on this expecting it to come from a 'local source' - 10C Presumably . But it hasn't so they are gonna run with it.
Can't be new music then, can it?
Tue January 29, 2013 11:21 am
Das Pit is suggesting coachella as a show announcement, but dime knows best
Tue January 29, 2013 11:27 am
There are a lot of Europeans laughing at the coachella crowd not knowing who the stone roses are. But it could be they're being replaced, however unlikely.
Tue January 29, 2013 11:37 am
If it isn't a single - which I am assuming it is - it could be a track for a forthcoming movie. A bit like SG did with Live to Rise. Build a bit of anticipation around the new album.
Tue January 29, 2013 11:46 am
yeah it is totally plausible that they are just releasing a song they've worked on for the album, or one they finished and decided not to keep. Certainly it would be helpful to get the ball rolling in anticipation of an album later in the year.
It is going to be pretty disappointing if the 10c thing has nothing to do with new music and that anti-quiet tweet was just poorly timed, but that guy seems to be in contact with a lot of the bands so presumably he would not have heard a song and posted about it if they didn't want that information out (unless I'm wrong about that site)
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.