The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
Post subject: An Evening with Pearl Jam = No Opener + ?
Posted: Mon January 28, 2013 12:34 am
Lost Cat
Joined: Mon January 28, 2013 12:07 am Posts: 3
These two upcoming July shows are being referred to as "An Evening with Pearl Jam"; how many of their previous concerts have carried this same exact description, and what were the set lists for those shows? It would be interesting to better understand if shows with this "An Evening with Pearl Jam" description have any tendencies to them beyond no opening band/act. Can we group-source this one?
I read that two shows at the Gorge in 2006 were described as "An Evening with Pearl Jam". Here are their setlists from TFT:
07/22/06 – The Gorge Amphitheatre, George, WA, USA set: Wash, Corduroy, Hail Hail, World Wide Suicide, Severed Hand, Given To Fly, Elderly Woman…, Even Flow, Down, I Am Mine, Unemployable, Daughter/(It’s OK), Gone, Black, Insignificance, Life Wasted, Blood first encore: Footsteps, Once, Alive, State of Love and Trust, Crown of Thorns, Leash, Porch second encore: Last Kiss, Inside Job, Go, Baba O’Riley, Dirty Frank, Rockin’ in the Free World, Yellow Ledbetter
07/23/06 – The Gorge Amphitheatre, George, WA, USA set: Severed Hand, Corduroy, World Wide Suicide, Gods’ Dice, Animal, Do The Evolution, In Hiding, Green Disease, Even Flow, Marker in the Sand, Wasted Reprise, Better Man/(Save it for Later), Army Reserve, Garden, Rats, Whipping, Jeremy, Why Go first encore: I Won’t Back Down, Life Wasted, Big Wave, Satan’s Bed, Spin the Black Circle, Alive second encore: Given to Fly, Little Wing, Crazy Mary, Comatose, Fuckin Up, Yellow Ledbetter/(Star-Spangled Banner)
Post subject: Re: An Evening with Pearl Jam = No Opener + ?
Posted: Mon January 28, 2013 1:19 am
Lost Cat
Joined: Mon January 28, 2013 12:07 am Posts: 3
(1st time, long time)
Besides the lack of an opening band, does history show that concerts designated as "An Evening with Pearl Jam" have anything special associated with them? Longer than average setlists, unique 1st or last song, guest spots, etc...
Post subject: Re: An Evening with Pearl Jam = No Opener + ?
Posted: Mon January 28, 2013 1:34 am
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm Posts: 32244 Location: Buenos Aires
History shows that concerts designated as "An Evening with Pearl Jam" take place in the Gorge. I surmise they will move the Gorge to Wrigley Field for this event.
Post subject: Re: An Evening with Pearl Jam = No Opener + ?
Posted: Mon January 28, 2013 1:36 am
what on earth am I talking about
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am Posts: 35441
Maple Jar wrote:
(1st time, long time)
Besides the lack of an opening band, does history show that concerts designated as "An Evening with Pearl Jam" have anything special associated with them? Longer than average setlists, unique 1st or last song, guest spots, etc...
Thought that was what you were getting at. Short answer, no. No it doesnt mean anything. And it being 2 shows they'll probably be woefully unrehearsed and it'll be nothing but knuckle draggers in the crowd.
Post subject: Re: An Evening with Pearl Jam = No Opener + ?
Posted: Mon January 28, 2013 2:21 am
10Club Complaint Department
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm Posts: 15095
Remember when everyone thought the band would play for over three hours at PJ20 with relevant special guests such as Neil Young and former band members?
I'd advise to keep your expectations relatively low.
Post subject: Re: An Evening with Pearl Jam = No Opener + ?
Posted: Mon January 28, 2013 4:18 am
AnalLog
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm Posts: 1627
Caller "vinyl guy" made a good reference to the Santa Barbara show. Minus the repeating of " I believe in mircles"it is probably the most exciting setlist/guest list to date.
Being in a 40k ballpark I'm thinking it will just be a slightly extended pj set. History tells us it could be either or but at the same time it tells us to keep expectations low and enjoy whatever it is that you get
Post subject: Re: An Evening with Pearl Jam = No Opener + ?
Posted: Mon January 28, 2013 12:44 pm
AnalLog
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm Posts: 1456
gardenparty wrote:
Caller "vinyl guy" made a good reference to the Santa Barbara show. Minus the repeating of " I believe in mircles"it is probably the most exciting setlist/guest list to date.
Being in a 40k ballpark I'm thinking it will just be a slightly extended pj set. History tells us it could be either or but at the same time it tells us to keep expectations low and enjoy whatever it is that you get
At Santa Barbara Ed said, "This like a mini-Gorge set" which seemed further confirmation that they would come out at the Gorge and play an acoustic set before the main set. It obviously didn't happen and I think that might have been due to the extreme heat and them wanting to conserve energy. 7/22 and 7/23 were the best shows I've ever seen by them, but I definitely expected acoustic set.
Post subject: Re: An Evening with Pearl Jam = No Opener + ?
Posted: Mon January 28, 2013 1:25 pm
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm Posts: 663
An Evening with Pearl Jam =
1) No opening band. 2) It will be in the evening. 3) Pearl Jam will be playing. 4) The wait for their 10th album is getting ridiculous. 5) They won't open with Rats.
_________________
Quote:
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
Post subject: Re: An Evening with Pearl Jam = No Opener + ?
Posted: Mon January 28, 2013 2:08 pm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am Posts: 21812
Yeah, it's an reference / borrowing from Zeppelin's early days, when they would tour without an opening act and bill the gigs as "An Evening with Led Zeppelin." It was a Peter Grant idea that the band went along with in spite of feeling that it had a bit of a 'theater' vibe to it...and one that's been liberally used by other acts off an on through the years ever since.
Zep, of course, did it because their improv-heavy concerts tended to be as long as Springsteen's would be a few years later...although at one early show Roger Daltry was said to have commented "I can see why nobody will play with these guys...they're just too good."
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum