The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Watched from the Window ... » Pearl Jam




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3377 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 165, 166, 167, 168, 169
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Wed March 27, 2024 10:05 pm 
Offline
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
 Profile

Joined: Wed February 26, 2020 8:43 am
Posts: 733
oneway23 wrote:
I don't buy the struggle = more valid art theory. They aren't exactly crammed together in a room anymore with cases of beer, taking bong rips and jamming....It's not as though they struggled for years schleping it in a van and sleeping on floors when they were young, either (at least not as Pearl Jam).

There are a lot of years and deep feelings many of us have invested, and, I'm sure each one of us has some notion of an ideal of how we'd prefer they carry themselves, how they'd write songs, or play, how often they'd release records, or what causes they'd espouse and how ethically they'd approach them, who we'd prefer they did (and didn't) do business with....on and on...

They're not going to reach the idealistic heights of every fan's mental conception of them....It's up to each of us how we balance these things against our own values.


I see the struggle that fuels creative fire less about access, wealth, and status, and more about having demons and being tortured. Basically having something to sing about. Not that having a great life and a family you love is not worthy of singing about. Plenty of songwriters have written beautiful, creative songs about happy subjects. I just wonder if that suits Pearl Jam’s style. Backspacer was a good attempt at that. Lightning Bolt was not. More broadly, if they just write more interesting music when the subject is dark and heavy.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Wed March 27, 2024 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22400
Ed is the weak link now

TOTD reunion tour proved it

1994 spring tour was the peak

fortunately we have recordings

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Wed March 27, 2024 10:25 pm 
Offline
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
 Profile

Joined: Wed February 26, 2020 8:43 am
Posts: 733
stip wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
oneway23 wrote:
I don't buy the struggle = more valid art theory.

I wasn't suggesting validity, only quality. And I don't think they have to be poor to struggle, but (in my mind) they'd need to retain some strong connection to the memory of what that felt like. I feel this is where some of them (leader Ed) has lost his way.


this is it right here. Pearl Jam has evolved. Or changed is maybe better if evolution implies progress. they are a different band doing something different than what they did when they were younger. this is not the first time. there is a major evolutionary leap forward/change with No Code as well.

I struggled with that run of albums because I was so much more interested and invested in who pearl jam was and who I wanted them to be rather than process them on the baiss of who they are. Others made that transition easily. And the quality of the music/the listeners experience of it still matters. It is easier for me to appreciate those middle records now for what they are and what PJ was trying to do rather than forc it into a pre-existing frame I had and wanted. But I still dont like the body of songs as much


In Running and songs like it, a complaint people levelis that Ed or the band (usually Ed) are trying to sound young. I dont think thats right. running is not an older man aping being young. It is the sound of an older man excited for the music he is hearing and expressing it in a way that feels inauthentic if you decide that this type of music is soley the posession of youth. What if all that’s sacred doesn’t just come from youth, and the old can do more than just remember?


Oooh nice. One thing I find very interesting is that their changes became less frequent over time, which is not unusual, as that mirrors how people tend to settle into who they are and change less over time too. And paralleling that is settling into a certain type of sound that they’ve found for themselves post self titled. I think you said it before, this is the band that Pearl Jam wanted to become, and they experimented with different things to get here. I only question how much of what PJ has become is really Eddie’s version of what he wants the band to be and sound like as he has increasingly driven creative control over time, moving further away from that early / “original” sound we know.

But those of us who have been fans since the beginning are rooted in the idea of the original Pearl Jam as being the true/authentic Pearl Jam. I wonder sometimes how people who have never heard their music before would perceive them if they were introduced to their albums in reverse.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Wed March 27, 2024 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22400
Ed loves cash, power, and famous friends

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Wed March 27, 2024 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Looks Like a Cat
 Profile

Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Posts: 14268
96583UP wrote:
Ed loves cash, power, and famous friends



We all do.

_________________
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Wed March 27, 2024 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22400
fair

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Wed March 27, 2024 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Production Police
 Profile

Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Posts: 47166
Location: In the oatmeal aisle wearing a Shellac shirt
Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:
Ed loves cash, power, and famous friends



We all do.

I’ve actively rejected famous friends. Bad juju for my psyche. Money is great, power is…in the eye of the beholder.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Wed March 27, 2024 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Posts: 34231
Location: Mountains
tragabigzanda wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:
Ed loves cash, power, and famous friends



We all do.

I’ve actively rejected famous friends. Bad juju for my psyche. Money is great, power is…in the eye of the beholder.

why are we friends im basically famous


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Wed March 27, 2024 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Posts: 21085
Location: Oslo, Norway
Strat wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Bi_3 wrote:
96583UP wrote:
Ed loves cash, power, and famous friends



We all do.

I’ve actively rejected famous friends. Bad juju for my psyche. Money is great, power is…in the eye of the beholder.

why are we friends im basically famous

Once one of your singles hit the charts, you won’t hear back from him.

Jokes aside… I’m with Trag on this one.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Thu March 28, 2024 2:04 am 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:57 am
Posts: 1955
Fattie_Vedder wrote:
oneway23 wrote:
I don't buy the struggle = more valid art theory. They aren't exactly crammed together in a room anymore with cases of beer, taking bong rips and jamming....It's not as though they struggled for years schleping it in a van and sleeping on floors when they were young, either (at least not as Pearl Jam).

There are a lot of years and deep feelings many of us have invested, and, I'm sure each one of us has some notion of an ideal of how we'd prefer they carry themselves, how they'd write songs, or play, how often they'd release records, or what causes they'd espouse and how ethically they'd approach them, who we'd prefer they did (and didn't) do business with....on and on...

They're not going to reach the idealistic heights of every fan's mental conception of them....It's up to each of us how we balance these things against our own values.


I see the struggle that fuels creative fire less about access, wealth, and status, and more about having demons and being tortured. Basically having something to sing about. Not that having a great life and a family you love is not worthy of singing about. Plenty of songwriters have written beautiful, creative songs about happy subjects. I just wonder if that suits Pearl Jam’s style. Backspacer was a good attempt at that. Lightning Bolt was not. More broadly, if they just write more interesting music when the subject is dark and heavy.

I see your point. He's extremely fortunate to have many wonderful things to croon about, but there are unfortunately an infinite number of horrible things going on in the world to write & sing about as well.
As many others have said, he's at his best making specific subjects into universal themes. Not so much the other way around.

_________________
We still make records to be listened to — not that everyone will listen to a record track one to twelve in a row or side A or Side B — but we still make 'em in case somebody does want to listen to it like that, that's how we make em…


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Thu March 28, 2024 2:21 am 
Offline
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
 Profile

Joined: Wed February 26, 2020 8:43 am
Posts: 733
oneway23 wrote:
Fattie_Vedder wrote:
oneway23 wrote:
I don't buy the struggle = more valid art theory. They aren't exactly crammed together in a room anymore with cases of beer, taking bong rips and jamming....It's not as though they struggled for years schleping it in a van and sleeping on floors when they were young, either (at least not as Pearl Jam).

There are a lot of years and deep feelings many of us have invested, and, I'm sure each one of us has some notion of an ideal of how we'd prefer they carry themselves, how they'd write songs, or play, how often they'd release records, or what causes they'd espouse and how ethically they'd approach them, who we'd prefer they did (and didn't) do business with....on and on...

They're not going to reach the idealistic heights of every fan's mental conception of them....It's up to each of us how we balance these things against our own values.


I see the struggle that fuels creative fire less about access, wealth, and status, and more about having demons and being tortured. Basically having something to sing about. Not that having a great life and a family you love is not worthy of singing about. Plenty of songwriters have written beautiful, creative songs about happy subjects. I just wonder if that suits Pearl Jam’s style. Backspacer was a good attempt at that. Lightning Bolt was not. More broadly, if they just write more interesting music when the subject is dark and heavy.

I see your point. He's extremely fortunate to have many wonderful things to croon about, but there are unfortunately an infinite number of horrible things going on in the world to write & sing about as well.
As many others have said, he's at his best making specific subjects into universal themes. Not so much the other way around.


Well said. I like that a lot.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Thu March 28, 2024 2:24 am 
Offline
User avatar
The worst
 Profile

Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Posts: 39922
that is nice phrasing

_________________
Dark Matter (album)( Review

I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Coming this July!
He/Him/His


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Thu March 28, 2024 2:33 am 
Offline
User avatar
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
 Profile

Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Posts: 22400
he is like John Moschitta Jr. meets The Days of Our Lives

no one makes a glam bridge like Edward Veddar in the year 2024

you might be rockin along, boppin' along, but then when it's bridge time? BAM HERE COMES THE GLAM

Image

_________________
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Thu March 28, 2024 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Posts: 47353
96583UP wrote:
he is like John Moschitta Jr. meets The Days of Our Lives

no one makes a glam bridge like Edward Veddar in the year 2024

you might be rockin along, boppin' along, but then when it's bridge time? BAM HERE COMES THE GLAM

Image

so horny for Hope right now

_________________
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Thu March 28, 2024 1:54 pm 
Offline
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Sat August 05, 2023 11:13 pm
Posts: 2577
96583UP wrote:
Ed is the weak link now

TOTD reunion tour proved it

1994 spring tour was the peak

fortunately we have recordings


Goddamn, the TOTD show was awesome.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Thu March 28, 2024 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Posts: 47353
tommy wrote:
96583UP wrote:
Ed is the weak link now

TOTD reunion tour proved it

1994 spring tour was the peak

fortunately we have recordings


Goddamn, the TOTD show was awesome.

Yeah, no PJ show since 2009 (that I attended in person) comes close to the TotD show I went to. Amazing.

_________________
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab
PostPosted: Fri March 29, 2024 12:54 am 
Offline
User avatar
Major Dude
 Profile

Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 32515
Location: Where everybody knows your name
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
96583UP wrote:
he is like John Moschitta Jr. meets The Days of Our Lives

no one makes a glam bridge like Edward Veddar in the year 2024

you might be rockin along, boppin' along, but then when it's bridge time? BAM HERE COMES THE GLAM

Image

so horny for Hope right now

Oh my!

_________________
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3377 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 165, 166, 167, 168, 169

Board index » Watched from the Window ... » Pearl Jam


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ducko, joostone, Ms Harmless, zeb and 115 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Sat April 27, 2024 7:26 am