Wed November 06, 2013 3:02 pm
gardenparty wrote:spike wrote:they should probably just retire this one
A crown is nice once a tour but I'm with ya on this
Wed November 06, 2013 3:15 pm
Birds in Hell wrote:Is this that video everyone was talking about the other day?
It's Boom's "fault": Matt's setting the tempo to begin the song, Boom should've followed suit but he comes in substantially slower. Matt tries to adjust but it's still a mess.
Wed November 06, 2013 3:20 pm
Kevin Davis wrote:gardenparty wrote:spike wrote:they should probably just retire this one
A crown is nice once a tour but I'm with ya on this
The PJ10 version was a beautiful moment and a wonderful performance. I can't think of another version that hasn't felt like a slog to get through, especially since they added the "Chloe Dancer" section, which Eddie doesn't have the voice for and which is just another exercise in why Boom's toy keyboard is no replacement for a baby grand.
Wed November 06, 2013 3:25 pm
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Kevin Davis wrote:gardenparty wrote:spike wrote:they should probably just retire this one
A crown is nice once a tour but I'm with ya on this
The PJ10 version was a beautiful moment and a wonderful performance. I can't think of another version that hasn't felt like a slog to get through, especially since they added the "Chloe Dancer" section, which Eddie doesn't have the voice for and which is just another exercise in why Boom's toy keyboard is no replacement for a baby grand.
i would love to get to hear it once before they put it away if they do, but its not one that ill be disappointed if i dont get to hear it
Wed November 06, 2013 3:38 pm
EJ wrote:Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Kevin Davis wrote:gardenparty wrote:spike wrote:they should probably just retire this one
A crown is nice once a tour but I'm with ya on this
The PJ10 version was a beautiful moment and a wonderful performance. I can't think of another version that hasn't felt like a slog to get through, especially since they added the "Chloe Dancer" section, which Eddie doesn't have the voice for and which is just another exercise in why Boom's toy keyboard is no replacement for a baby grand.
i would love to get to hear it once before they put it away if they do, but its not one that ill be disappointed if i dont get to hear it
I've now seen it 3 times in the past 10 years. The first time at MSG1 2003 was pretty incredible. But, it really seems like a song they should only play once every 5 years or so.
Wed November 06, 2013 3:39 pm
Strat wrote:Birds in Hell wrote:Is this that video everyone was talking about the other day?
It's Boom's "fault": Matt's setting the tempo to begin the song, Boom should've followed suit but he comes in substantially slower. Matt tries to adjust but it's still a mess.
Thank you so much. I haven't read any other post in this thread but im sure this set harmless off.
Wed November 06, 2013 4:47 pm
harmless wrote:Strat wrote:Birds in Hell wrote:Is this that video everyone was talking about the other day?
It's Boom's "fault": Matt's setting the tempo to begin the song, Boom should've followed suit but he comes in substantially slower. Matt tries to adjust but it's still a mess.
Thank you so much. I haven't read any other post in this thread but im sure this set harmless off.
If you'd read some other posts in this thread, maybe you'd understand why I disagree instead of constantly dismissing my opinion because it's not pro-Matt.
Wed November 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Strat wrote:harmless wrote:Strat wrote:Birds in Hell wrote:Is this that video everyone was talking about the other day?
It's Boom's "fault": Matt's setting the tempo to begin the song, Boom should've followed suit but he comes in substantially slower. Matt tries to adjust but it's still a mess.
Thank you so much. I haven't read any other post in this thread but im sure this set harmless off.
If you'd read some other posts in this thread, maybe you'd understand why I disagree instead of constantly dismissing my opinion because it's not pro-Matt.
harmless, we're all friends here. Anyone get to you yet?
Wed November 06, 2013 5:05 pm
Wed November 06, 2013 5:07 pm
Wed November 06, 2013 5:17 pm
dimejinky99 wrote:But now I can't imagine PJ without him. Nor do I think they'd continue if he left.
Wed November 06, 2013 5:26 pm
Chris_H_2 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:But now I can't imagine PJ without him. Nor do I think they'd continue if he left.
I $uggest that perhap$ the remaining member$ would $tay together.
Wed November 06, 2013 5:31 pm
Wed November 06, 2013 5:59 pm
Wed November 06, 2013 6:00 pm
Wed November 06, 2013 6:01 pm
Wed November 06, 2013 6:02 pm
dimejinky99 wrote:MC isn't enthusiastic?
Wed November 06, 2013 6:08 pm
Wed November 06, 2013 6:28 pm
Wed November 06, 2013 6:30 pm