The board's server will undergo upgrade maintenance tonight, Nov 5, 2014, beginning approximately around 10 PM ET. Prepare for some possible down time during this process.
FAQ    Search

Board index » Watched from the Window ... » Pearl Jam




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 235 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 3:02 pm 
Offline
Misplaced My Sponge
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Posts: 5595
gardenparty wrote:
spike wrote:
they should probably just retire this one

:thumbsup:
A crown is nice once a tour but I'm with ya on this


The PJ10 version was a beautiful moment and a wonderful performance. I can't think of another version that hasn't felt like a slog to get through, especially since they added the "Chloe Dancer" section, which Eddie doesn't have the voice for and which is just another exercise in why Boom's toy keyboard is no replacement for a baby grand.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Posts: 31919
Location: Mountains
Birds in Hell wrote:
Is this that video everyone was talking about the other day?

It's Boom's "fault": Matt's setting the tempo to begin the song, Boom should've followed suit but he comes in substantially slower. Matt tries to adjust but it's still a mess.



Thank you so much. I haven't read any other post in this thread but im sure this set harmless off.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
 Profile

Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Posts: 10577
Kevin Davis wrote:
gardenparty wrote:
spike wrote:
they should probably just retire this one

:thumbsup:
A crown is nice once a tour but I'm with ya on this


The PJ10 version was a beautiful moment and a wonderful performance. I can't think of another version that hasn't felt like a slog to get through, especially since they added the "Chloe Dancer" section, which Eddie doesn't have the voice for and which is just another exercise in why Boom's toy keyboard is no replacement for a baby grand.

i would love to get to hear it once before they put it away if they do, but its not one that ill be disappointed if i dont get to hear it


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Misplaced My Sponge
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Posts: 5852
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
gardenparty wrote:
spike wrote:
they should probably just retire this one

:thumbsup:
A crown is nice once a tour but I'm with ya on this


The PJ10 version was a beautiful moment and a wonderful performance. I can't think of another version that hasn't felt like a slog to get through, especially since they added the "Chloe Dancer" section, which Eddie doesn't have the voice for and which is just another exercise in why Boom's toy keyboard is no replacement for a baby grand.

i would love to get to hear it once before they put it away if they do, but its not one that ill be disappointed if i dont get to hear it


I've now seen it 3 times in the past 10 years. The first time at MSG1 2003 was pretty incredible. But, it really seems like a song they should only play once every 5 years or so.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
 Profile

Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Posts: 10577
EJ wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
gardenparty wrote:
spike wrote:
they should probably just retire this one

:thumbsup:
A crown is nice once a tour but I'm with ya on this


The PJ10 version was a beautiful moment and a wonderful performance. I can't think of another version that hasn't felt like a slog to get through, especially since they added the "Chloe Dancer" section, which Eddie doesn't have the voice for and which is just another exercise in why Boom's toy keyboard is no replacement for a baby grand.

i would love to get to hear it once before they put it away if they do, but its not one that ill be disappointed if i dont get to hear it


I've now seen it 3 times in the past 10 years. The first time at MSG1 2003 was pretty incredible. But, it really seems like a song they should only play once every 5 years or so.

id imagine its been played in NY more then anywhere else, so i can see people who always catching them there seeing it quite a few times


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Posting (live)
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Posts: 18711
Strat wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
Is this that video everyone was talking about the other day?

It's Boom's "fault": Matt's setting the tempo to begin the song, Boom should've followed suit but he comes in substantially slower. Matt tries to adjust but it's still a mess.



Thank you so much. I haven't read any other post in this thread but im sure this set harmless off.


If you'd read some other posts in this thread, maybe you'd understand why I disagree instead of constantly dismissing my opinion because it's not pro-Matt.

_________________
RisingTides wrote:
There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar
The Master
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Posts: 31919
Location: Mountains
harmless wrote:
Strat wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
Is this that video everyone was talking about the other day?

It's Boom's "fault": Matt's setting the tempo to begin the song, Boom should've followed suit but he comes in substantially slower. Matt tries to adjust but it's still a mess.



Thank you so much. I haven't read any other post in this thread but im sure this set harmless off.


If you'd read some other posts in this thread, maybe you'd understand why I disagree instead of constantly dismissing my opinion because it's not pro-Matt.



harmless, we're all friends here. Anyone get to you yet?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Posting (live)
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Posts: 18711
Strat wrote:
harmless wrote:
Strat wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
Is this that video everyone was talking about the other day?

It's Boom's "fault": Matt's setting the tempo to begin the song, Boom should've followed suit but he comes in substantially slower. Matt tries to adjust but it's still a mess.



Thank you so much. I haven't read any other post in this thread but im sure this set harmless off.


If you'd read some other posts in this thread, maybe you'd understand why I disagree instead of constantly dismissing my opinion because it's not pro-Matt.



harmless, we're all friends here. Anyone get to you yet?


Everyone and everything gets to me.

_________________
RisingTides wrote:
There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
"You kids quit having fun with the word filter!"
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 27837
Location: don't PM me I don't have anything
STONE TELL 'IM

_________________
tragabigzanda wrote:
Stop it, this is pissing me off.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Posting (live)
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 18845
I would have backed this motion a few years ago. (2006/7)

But now I can't imagine PJ without him. Nor do I think they'd continue if he left.

It was a screw up. They happen.

They happen in soundgarden live gigs all the time if my pal Randall is to be believed.

_________________
durdencommatyler wrote:
dimejinky-the Han Solo of RM.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Mind Your Tanners
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Posts: 8314
Location: An office full of assholes
dimejinky99 wrote:
But now I can't imagine PJ without him. Nor do I think they'd continue if he left.


I $uggest that perhap$ the remaining member$ would $tay together.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
 Profile

Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Posts: 10577
Chris_H_2 wrote:
dimejinky99 wrote:
But now I can't imagine PJ without him. Nor do I think they'd continue if he left.


I $uggest that perhap$ the remaining member$ would $tay together.


they had said in the past( or at least ed did) that they wouldnt continue if matt left, but that was a long time ago, and ill be with him playing with soundgarden again that they have they have talked a bit about him possibly leaving permanently. i dont think they want him to go, but im pretty sure they would survive if he did


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Posting (live)
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 18845
If he left, and they replaced him, it could actually be a good move in terms of songwriting and evolution of the whole thing.

I'm not saying he should but its a thought.

_________________
durdencommatyler wrote:
dimejinky-the Han Solo of RM.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Future Drummer
 Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Posts: 2784
I'd ding Matt and Boom, and bring in Uncle Neil for another recording session and see what happens.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 6:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Posting (live)
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Posts: 18711
I would be a million times more interested in Pearl Jam if they got a great *and* enthusiastic drummer involved.

_________________
RisingTides wrote:
There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Posting (live)
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 18845
MC isn't enthusiastic?

_________________
durdencommatyler wrote:
dimejinky-the Han Solo of RM.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar
AnalLog
 Profile

Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Posts: 1859
dimejinky99 wrote:
MC isn't enthusiastic?

i think he meant enthusiastic about his (long) hair


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Posting (live)
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 18845
He's a hyperactive kid jizzed up on twenty cans of soda by comparison to jack irons. If you want to talk about enthusiasm

_________________
durdencommatyler wrote:
dimejinky-the Han Solo of RM.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 6:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Posting (live)
 Profile

Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Posts: 18711
Matt is not enthusiastic about Pearl Jam's music, in spite of being a kid on too many sweets in general. I'm not going to have yet another conversation about it, it's just what I think. He seems bored in Pearl Jam, and thoroughly excited by Soundgarden. Jack Irons might've been a quieter person than Matt, but he sure as hell enjoyed playing Pearl Jam's music. You could tell just by listening.

_________________
RisingTides wrote:
There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Time to send Matt back to SG?
PostPosted: Wed November 06, 2013 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Posting (live)
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Posts: 18845
Brave words.

Dave A is now the drummer In Peter Cornells band. Yes brother of that sham Chris.
That's a shame. Nobody could outdo dave for enthusiasm. Or hair.

_________________
durdencommatyler wrote:
dimejinky-the Han Solo of RM.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 235 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next

Board index » Watched from the Window ... » Pearl Jam


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
It is currently Tue January 23, 2018 3:51 am