Switch to full style
General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post a reply

Rate the Song

5 Stars
12
8%
4 Stars
31
20%
3 Stars
73
47%
2 Stars
31
20%
1 Star
9
6%
 
Total votes : 156

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:34 pm

Image

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:38 pm

I'm not really sure what it actually is that makes it so older guys can't have songs that sound as intense, raw, and aggressive as they did when they were younger (too clean production might be part of it?) or what makes it come off 'corny' or 'uncool' when it never did back in the 90s. Maybe it's just a youthful aggression that just isn't in them anymore? And that's fine. I guess I just prefer older Pearl Jam when they are more thoughtful or something? IDK. There's nothing wrong with them having a fun time and playing songs like this that they enjoy, it just comes off as a bit unappealing to me on the albums. Maybe I just expect rock (especially punkier rock) to have more teeth? And that's something Breed does have that this does not.

I do like their corny rockers sometimes, I liked the song Lightning Bolt even, but these ones specifically just never work for me for some reason.

Unless it's like Backspacer where they lean so far into it you can no longer deny them.

I also liked Self-Titled for some reason, which similarly seemed to lean into what it was but the energy there was exuberant to me.

Maybe somebody better with expressing themselves about music than me can put together what Im not getting from Running that makes it sound so...sterile? I dont know.

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:38 pm

Ms Harmless wrote:I think Backspacer pretended to be a lot of things it wasn't (a good pop album, a good new-wave album)

To think I once fully appreciated and respected you. SAD :shake:

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:46 pm

Tj wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:I think Backspacer pretended to be a lot of things it wasn't (a good pop album, a good new-wave album)

To think I once fully appreciated and respected you. SAD :shake:


don't get me wrong, I think Backspacer is good in other ways, but my main issue with it is the same as Lightning Bolt: it's all over the place tonally and thematically; yeah, there's a bit of pop on there, yeah, there's a bit of new-wave on there, but for two albums that do those things more consistently across their whole runtime, look at Paramore's After Laughter and This is Why

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:49 pm

RockPusher wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Please calm down


Why?

Strat was getting a little too excited with that post. He needs to calm down.

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:54 pm

Ms Harmless wrote:
Tj wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:I think Backspacer pretended to be a lot of things it wasn't (a good pop album, a good new-wave album)

To think I once fully appreciated and respected you. SAD :shake:


don't get me wrong, I think Backspacer is good in other ways, but my main issue with it is the same as Lightning Bolt: it's all over the place tonally and thematically; yeah, there's a bit of pop on there, yeah, there's a bit of new-wave on there, but for two albums that do those things more consistently across their whole runtime, look at Paramore's After Laughter and This is Why

Ok, After Laughter and This is Why I'm back on team Harmless. I have a Thick Skull

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:54 pm

It's been said before on this thread but REMs 'Accelerate' is a good example of a late career rock album where the band sounds authentic.

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:55 pm

Strat wrote:im sick of ruddo policing me

I'll help you

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:56 pm

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Please calm down


Why?

Strat was getting a little too excited with that post. He needs to calm down.


:roll:

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:57 pm

Tj wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Tj wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:I think Backspacer pretended to be a lot of things it wasn't (a good pop album, a good new-wave album)

To think I once fully appreciated and respected you. SAD :shake:


don't get me wrong, I think Backspacer is good in other ways, but my main issue with it is the same as Lightning Bolt: it's all over the place tonally and thematically; yeah, there's a bit of pop on there, yeah, there's a bit of new-wave on there, but for two albums that do those things more consistently across their whole runtime, look at Paramore's After Laughter and This is Why

Ok, After Laughter and This is Why I'm back on team Harmless. I have a Thick Skull


I like Backspacer, I like Lightning Bolt less, but they both have good attempts at that kind of thing on them; I just feel like they've never convinced me that "pop" or "new wave" are in their bones; maybe Dark Matter will do it? here's hoping

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:58 pm

RockPusher wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Please calm down


Why?

Strat was getting a little too excited with that post. He needs to calm down.


:roll:

I mean, "LET'S GO!" is pretty aggressive.

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 7:59 pm

I know I've said it over and over again but to me, the most "fun" PJ have ever sounded was on Lost Dogs (Hitchhiker, Gremmie)

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 8:00 pm

mikejasond wrote:I'm not really sure what it actually is that makes it so older guys can't have songs that sound as intense, raw, and aggressive as they did when they were younger (too clean production might be part of it?) or what makes it come off 'corny' or 'uncool' when it never did back in the 90s. Maybe it's just a youthful aggression that just isn't in them anymore? And that's fine. I guess I just prefer older Pearl Jam when they are more thoughtful or something? IDK. There's nothing wrong with them having a fun time and playing songs like this that they enjoy, it just comes off as a bit unappealing to me on the albums. Maybe I just expect rock (especially punkier rock) to have more teeth? And that's something Breed does have that this does not.

I do like their corny rockers sometimes, I liked the song Lightning Bolt even, but these ones specifically just never work for me for some reason.

Unless it's like Backspacer where they lean so far into it you can no longer deny them.

I also liked Self-Titled for some reason, which similarly seemed to lean into what it was but the energy there was exuberant to me.

Maybe somebody better with expressing themselves about music than me can put together what Im not getting from Running that makes it sound so...sterile? I dont know.

Age-ism.

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 8:00 pm

Ms Harmless wrote:I know I've said it over and over again but to me, the most "fun" PJ have ever sounded was on Lost Dogs (Hitchhiker, Gremmie)

Oh yeah, two excellent songs.

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 8:00 pm

Here’s the thing where trag has a real point: any sense that these songs are artificial or not authentic I think would have less to do with their numbered ages and more to do with the drums sounding like they were generated from a computer program than a human being. They sound canned even if they are actually being played by a person, which is a sound issue more than a song issue. Both of these songs I think will sound better live sounding drums.

A note that I actually enjoyed both songs and rated Dark Matter 4 stars and Running 3 stars.

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 8:02 pm

I think Pearl Jam sounds authentic. I just think there a bunch of uncool dad dorks I'm ok with that.

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 8:02 pm

Tj wrote:I think Pearl Jam sounds authentic. I just think there a bunch of uncool dad dorks I'm ok with that.

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 8:03 pm

I always considered myself a cool dad dork, now I have to rethink things!

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 8:04 pm

oneway23 wrote:Image

:heartbeat: :heartbeat: :heartbeat: Love this so much

Re: Running

Thu March 28, 2024 8:05 pm

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I always considered myself a cool dad dork, now I have to rethink things!

A paradox within a paradox, to be sure

tragabigzanda wrote: :heartbeat: :heartbeat: :heartbeat: Love this so much

Somehow, I thought you might
Post a reply